vivo iQOO Neo3 5G vs Honor 30 Pro+: Which 5G Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and gaming, the vivo iQOO Neo3 5G emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset, while older, delivers consistently strong performance, and its 44W charging is faster than the Honor 30 Pro+'s wired option. The Honor 30 Pro+ counters with wireless charging and a slightly longer endurance rating, but the iQOO Neo3's value proposition is stronger.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo3 5G | Honor 30 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 25, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (3.3 Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 23. Released 2020, April 29 | 2020, April 15. Released 2020, April 21 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.6 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 160.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.1 g (6.98 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.0 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.57 inches, 106.0 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | OLED, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Kirin 990 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G76 MP16 |
| OS | Android 10, iQOO UI 1.0 | Android 10, Magic UI 3, no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (Periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 18mm (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 1080p@1920fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K, 1080p; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 20 min, 100% in 58 min | 40W wired 27W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black/Dark Blue | Titanium silver, Emerald Green, Midnight Black |
| Models | V1981A | EBG-AN10 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 650 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 510031 (v8) GeekBench: 3191 (v5.1) GFXBench: 37fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo3 5G
- Faster 44W wired charging
- Stronger sustained performance with Snapdragon 865
- Potentially better thermal management
- Camera details are limited
- No wireless charging
Honor 30 Pro+
- Wireless charging support
- Excellent 99-hour endurance rating
- Higher peak display brightness (586 nits)
- Slower wired charging (40W)
- Kirin 990 may exhibit more throttling under load
- Software support concerns due to brand history
Display Comparison
The Honor 30 Pro+ boasts a measured peak brightness of 586 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the iQOO Neo3 5G (brightness data unavailable). Both utilize 7nm+ fabrication, implying similar efficiency in driving the displays. However, without knowing the iQOO Neo3’s panel type or refresh rate, it’s difficult to assess its overall visual experience. The Honor 30 Pro+'s 'Infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term; real-world contrast performance depends on the panel technology used.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, given the market positioning, the Honor 30 Pro+ likely prioritizes camera features more heavily. The absence of details on the iQOO Neo3 suggests a more functional, less feature-rich camera system. Any 2MP macro lenses on either device should be considered a marketing gimmick rather than a significant photographic asset.
Performance
The iQOO Neo3 5G’s Snapdragon 865 5G (7nm+) and the Honor 30 Pro+'s Kirin 990 5G (7nm+) are both flagship-class chipsets, but differ in architecture. The Snapdragon 865 utilizes a 1+3+4 core configuration with Cortex-A77 cores, while the Kirin 990 employs a 2+2+4 configuration with Cortex-A76 cores. While clock speeds are similar (2.84GHz vs 2.86GHz), the Snapdragon 865 generally exhibits superior sustained performance and GPU capabilities, making it more suitable for demanding games. The iQOO Neo3 5G benefits from Qualcomm’s optimizations, potentially leading to better thermal management and less throttling under prolonged load.
Battery Life
The Honor 30 Pro+ achieves an endurance rating of 99 hours, indicating excellent battery life. However, the iQOO Neo3 5G’s 44W wired charging (50% in 20 minutes, 100% in 58 minutes) is significantly faster than the Honor 30 Pro+'s 40W wired charging. The Honor 30 Pro+ also offers 27W wireless charging and 5W reverse wired charging, providing added convenience. While the Honor 30 Pro+ may last longer on a single charge, the iQOO Neo3 5G’s faster charging mitigates this advantage for users who frequently top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo3 5G if you need a phone primarily for gaming, demanding applications, and fast charging. Its Snapdragon 865 provides a robust foundation for sustained performance. Buy the Honor 30 Pro+ if you prioritize wireless charging convenience, a slightly longer battery life, and potentially prefer Honor's software experience (though software support is a key consideration given the brand's history).