iQOO Neo11 vs Redmi K70 Pro: A Head-to-Head Battle of Snapdragon Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and efficiency, the iQOO Neo11 emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite, built on a 3nm process, offers a compelling blend of power and thermal management. While the Redmi K70 Pro boasts the raw horsepower of the Gen 3, its 4nm node may lead to more noticeable throttling during extended gaming sessions.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo11 (China) | Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 30 | 2023, November 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 30 | Available. Released 2023, November 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 76.7 x 8.1 mm (6.43 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) | 160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm (6.33 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g or 216 g (7.41 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Rock Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2592Hz PWM, HDR10+ | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 16, OriginOS 6 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, (ultrawide) |
| Video | 8K, 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 44W UFCS, 55W PD3.0/PPS Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 18 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Orange, Blue | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Lamborgini Green, Lamborgini Yellow |
| Models | V2520A | 23117RK66C |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 430 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo11 (China)
- More efficient Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm)
- Versatile charging options (100W wired, UFCS, PD3.0/PPS)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slightly slower wired charging than the K70 Pro
- Camera specs currently unknown
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro
- Faster 120W wired charging
- Potentially higher peak performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Xiaomi’s typically vibrant image processing
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) may run hotter under sustained load
- Less versatile charging options
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided, but given the flagship positioning, both devices likely feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED panels. The key differentiator will be peak brightness and color accuracy. The Redmi K70 Pro, following Xiaomi’s trend, may prioritize peak brightness for HDR content. The iQOO Neo11, potentially focusing on efficiency, might offer a more color-accurate display. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, reflecting current design trends.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, but both brands typically equip their flagships with capable camera systems. The Redmi K70 Pro, given Xiaomi’s history, may feature a larger megapixel count and a more aggressive image processing style, aiming for vibrant, social media-ready photos. The iQOO Neo11 might lean towards a more natural color profile. Sensor size and OIS implementation will be crucial; a larger sensor on either device will translate to better low-light performance. The absence of details necessitates speculation, but both are expected to offer versatile camera setups.
Performance
The core battle lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Neo11’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) utilizes Oryon V2 Phoenix cores, designed for a balance of performance and efficiency. This contrasts with the Redmi K70 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) which employs Cortex-X4 and A720 cores. While the Gen 3’s X4 core boasts a higher clock speed (3.3 GHz vs 4.32 GHz on the Neo11’s prime core), the 3nm process of the 8 Elite should result in lower power consumption and better thermal headroom. The Neo11’s architecture suggests a focus on sustained performance, while the K70 Pro will likely excel in short, intense tasks. Both devices will benefit from LPDDR5x RAM, but thermal management will be the deciding factor in prolonged workloads.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified, but the charging capabilities reveal key differences. The Redmi K70 Pro’s 120W wired charging promises a full charge in just 18 minutes, a significant advantage for users prioritizing speed. The iQOO Neo11 offers 100W wired charging, alongside 44W UFCS and 55W PD3.0/PPS, providing greater versatility in charging options. The Neo11’s inclusion of reverse wired charging is a useful feature for topping up accessories. The efficiency of the Snapdragon 8 Elite could offset a potentially smaller battery capacity in the iQOO Neo11, resulting in comparable real-world battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo11 (China) if you need a phone that prioritizes sustained gaming performance and efficient power consumption, offering a cooler experience under load. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro if you prefer maximum raw processing power for demanding tasks like video editing or consistently high frame rates in short bursts, and value the fastest possible wired charging.