iQOO Neo11 vs OnePlus Ace 3 Pro: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Snapdragon Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw gaming performance and potentially better thermal management, the iQOO Neo11 with its Snapdragon 8 Elite is the winner. However, the OnePlus Ace 3 Pro offers a more mature software experience and wider availability, making it a strong contender for those valuing overall polish.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo11 (China) | OnePlus Ace 3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 30 | 2024, June 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 30 | Available. Released 2024, July 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 76.7 x 8.1 mm (6.43 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.7 / 8.9 / 9.0 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g or 216 g (7.41 oz) | 207 g, 212 g, 225 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Rock Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2592Hz PWM, HDR10+ | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 16, OriginOS 6 | Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K, 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 44W UFCS, 55W PD3.0/PPS Reverse wired | 100W wired, PD2.0, QC2, 52% in 15 min, 100% in 36 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7500 mAh | 6100 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Orange, Blue | Gray, White, Green |
| Models | V2520A | PJX110 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 410 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo11 (China)
- Potentially superior CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- More advanced 3nm manufacturing process for better efficiency
- UFCS charging support for wider compatibility
- China-focused software and limited global availability
- Potential for software bugs and translation issues
OnePlus Ace 3 Pro
- Globally available with mature OxygenOS software
- Proven Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance and stability
- Hasselblad-tuned camera for natural image processing
- Less cutting-edge CPU architecture compared to Snapdragon 8 Elite
- 4nm process may result in slightly higher thermal throttling
Display Comparison
While both devices are expected to feature high refresh rate AMOLED displays, specific details like peak brightness and panel technology are missing. However, the iQOO Neo11's potential use of a newer panel generation could offer advantages in color accuracy and power efficiency. The OnePlus Ace 3 Pro, benefiting from OnePlus' display tuning expertise, will likely deliver a vibrant and well-calibrated visual experience. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, focusing on maximizing screen real estate.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the brands' history, both phones will likely feature capable main sensors. The iQOO Neo11 may lean towards a more vibrant, saturated image processing style, typical of vivo phones. The OnePlus Ace 3 Pro, influenced by Hasselblad tuning, will likely aim for more natural color reproduction. The absence of information on OIS and lens apertures prevents a definitive assessment, but the main sensor size will be a key differentiator.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Neo11’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) utilizes Oryon V2 Phoenix cores, promising a significant IPC (Instructions Per Clock) uplift over traditional Arm Cortex designs. This translates to faster single-core performance, crucial for responsive UI and app loading. The OnePlus Ace 3 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) relies on Cortex-X4 and A720 cores, a proven architecture. While the 4nm process offers good efficiency, the 3nm node of the 8 Elite should provide superior thermal headroom, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The iQOO's architecture suggests a focus on raw processing power, while the OnePlus prioritizes a balanced approach.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 100W wired charging, promising rapid replenishment. The OnePlus Ace 3 Pro claims a 52% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 36 minutes. The iQOO Neo11 supports 100W wired, 44W UFCS, and 55W PD3.0/PPS, offering greater charging flexibility. UFCS is a newer standard, potentially offering faster charging with compatible accessories. While battery capacity is unknown, the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s 3nm process should contribute to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting a smaller battery size compared to the Ace 3 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo11 (China) if you need the absolute highest CPU performance for demanding tasks and gaming, and are comfortable with a China-focused software experience. Buy the OnePlus Ace 3 Pro if you prefer a globally-supported device with a refined user interface, and prioritize a balance between performance and battery life.