iQOO Neo10 Pro+ vs Redmi K60 Pro: A Head-to-Head Battle of Snapdragon Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing absolute CPU performance and don't mind potentially higher thermal output, the iQOO Neo10 Pro+ is the winner. However, the Redmi K60 Pro offers a more refined experience with better efficiency, wireless charging, and a more balanced feature set, making it the better all-rounder for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) | Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 20 | 2022, December 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 20 | Available. Released 2023, January 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 76.6 x 8.2 mm (6.45 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm or 8.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g or 217 g (7.48 oz) | 201 g or 205 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1 - 128GB only | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K, 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100W PPS+PD, 70% in 25 min Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 19 min 30W wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue | Black, White, Mint, Champion Black |
| Models | - | 22127RK46C |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 460 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China)
- Potentially highest CPU performance in its class
- Extremely fast wired charging (120W)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Potentially higher thermal output
- No wireless charging
- 3nm process may not translate to significant real-world battery gains
Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro
- Excellent balance of performance and efficiency
- Wireless charging support (30W)
- Mature and optimized Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 platform
- Slightly lower peak CPU performance compared to Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Wired charging, while fast, is slightly slower than iQOO initially
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays (data not provided), the core difference lies in the underlying chipsets impacting power draw and potential display capabilities. The Snapdragon 8 Elite's higher power consumption *could* necessitate a slightly less aggressive display configuration to manage battery life. The Redmi K60 Pro, benefiting from the 4nm process, has more headroom for features like higher peak brightness or more sophisticated LTPO implementations. Without specific display specs, it's reasonable to assume the Redmi K60 Pro will offer a more efficient and potentially brighter display experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the chipset plays a role in image signal processing (ISP) capabilities. Both Snapdragon chips feature excellent ISPs, but the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s newer architecture *could* offer slight advantages in computational photography. The Redmi K60 Pro’s efficiency might allow for longer video recording times without overheating. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and OIS makes it impossible to definitively declare a winner; however, the Redmi K60 Pro’s more efficient power management could lead to more consistent camera performance.
Performance
The iQOO Neo10 Pro+ boasts the Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm), featuring a unique octa-core configuration with Oryon V2 Phoenix cores clocked up to 4.32 GHz. This architecture is designed for peak performance, potentially exceeding the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in raw CPU benchmarks. However, the Redmi K60 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) utilizes a more traditional core arrangement (Cortex-X3, A715, A710, A510) and benefits from a more mature and efficient 4nm manufacturing process. This translates to better sustained performance and thermal management, especially during prolonged gaming sessions. The iQOO’s advantage is burst performance, while the Redmi K60 Pro prioritizes consistent, efficient power.
Battery Life
Both devices support 120W wired charging, promising incredibly fast top-ups. The Redmi K60 Pro claims a full charge in 19 minutes, while the iQOO Neo10 Pro+ reaches 70% in 25 minutes. The Redmi K60 Pro also adds 30W wireless charging, a feature absent on the iQOO. While the iQOO’s wired charging is slightly faster initially, the Redmi K60 Pro’s wireless charging and potentially more efficient chipset (4nm vs 3nm) offer greater versatility and potentially longer real-world battery life. The Snapdragon 8 Elite’s higher power draw will likely necessitate a larger battery to achieve comparable endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) if you need the absolute fastest CPU performance for demanding tasks like video editing or emulation, and are comfortable with potentially needing to manage thermals during extended gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro if you prefer a more efficient processor, the convenience of wireless charging, and a generally more balanced smartphone experience with excellent performance across the board.