iQOO Neo10 Pro+ vs Realme GT Neo 5: A Head-to-Head of Charging and Chipset Choices
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and efficiency, the iQOO Neo10 Pro+ emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, fabricated on a 3nm node, offers a significant advantage in thermal management and power efficiency, despite the Realme GT Neo 5’s blistering 240W charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) | Realme GT Neo 5 240W |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 20 | 2023, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 20 | Available. Released 2023, February 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 76.6 x 8.2 mm (6.45 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g or 217 g (7.48 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| - | Illuminated RGB (on the back) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) |
| Video | 8K, 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100W PPS+PD, 70% in 25 min Reverse wired | 240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6800 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue | Purple, Black, White |
| Models | - | RMX3708 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 440 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China)
- More efficient Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- 100W PPS+PD charging compatibility
- Slower charging speed compared to Realme
- China exclusive availability
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- Blazing-fast 240W charging
- Proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Wider availability (potentially)
- Less efficient chipset, potential for throttling
- May require a proprietary charger for 240W speeds
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the target market, both likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels. The iQOO, positioned as a slightly more premium offering, may benefit from a higher peak brightness or more sophisticated color calibration. Realme typically focuses on maximizing value, so the GT Neo 5’s panel may prioritize refresh rate over absolute color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, analysis is limited. However, both phones likely feature a multi-camera system with a primary sensor. The iQOO, potentially targeting a more discerning user, might prioritize a larger sensor size and optical image stabilization (OIS) for improved low-light performance. Realme often focuses on megapixel count, but image processing algorithms are equally crucial. The absence of details prevents a definitive assessment, but the iQOO’s positioning suggests a greater emphasis on overall image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Neo10 Pro+’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) boasts a custom Oryon CPU architecture with a 2x4.32 GHz prime core and 6x3.53 GHz performance cores. This contrasts with the Realme GT Neo 5’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) which uses a 1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510 configuration. The 3nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Elite provides a significant advantage in power efficiency and thermal headroom. While the 8+ Gen 1 is a capable chip, it’s more prone to throttling under sustained load. The iQOO’s architecture suggests a focus on single-core performance, beneficial for responsiveness, while the 8+ Gen 1 excels in multi-core tasks. The iQOO’s LPDDR5x RAM will also contribute to faster data transfer speeds.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo 5’s 240W charging is its headline feature, promising a 0-100% charge in just 10 minutes. The iQOO Neo10 Pro+ offers a more conservative 120W wired charging, taking 25 minutes to reach 70%. While the Realme’s charging speed is undeniably faster, the iQOO’s 100W PPS+PD support offers broader compatibility with chargers and accessories. The actual battery capacity of both devices is unknown, but the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s efficiency could allow the iQOO to achieve comparable real-world battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery cell. The faster charging of the Realme is ideal for users who frequently need to top up quickly, while the iQOO offers a more balanced approach.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) if you need a phone that prioritizes long-term sustained performance during demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value the benefits of a more efficient chipset. Buy the Realme GT Neo 5 240W if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds and are willing to potentially trade off some sustained performance for that convenience.