iQOO Neo10 Pro+ vs Oppo Find X6 Pro: A Head-to-Head Battle of Snapdragon Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and rapid charging, the iQOO Neo10 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite offers a demonstrable performance advantage. However, the Oppo Find X6 Pro provides a more polished, all-around experience with excellent battery endurance and a potentially superior camera system, making it the better choice for mainstream users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) | Oppo Find X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 20 | 2023, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 20 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 76.6 x 8.2 mm (6.45 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) | 164.8 x 76.2 x 9.1 mm or 9.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g or 217 g (7.48 oz) | 216 g or 218 g (7.62 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO3 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1500 nits (HBM), 2500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 8K, 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100W PPS+PD, 70% in 25 min Reverse wired | 100W wired, PD, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 30 min 50W wireless, 50% in 22 min, 100% in 51 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue | Black, Green, Brown |
| Models | - | PGEM110, PGEM10 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 820 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1294797 (v9) GeekBench: 4791 (v5.1), 5226 (v6) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China)
- Unmatched CPU/GPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Potentially lower price (typical of iQOO)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Lack of wireless charging
- Limited camera information
- Potentially higher thermal output
Oppo Find X6 Pro
- Excellent battery life (114h endurance)
- Bright and vibrant display (1318 nits)
- Versatile charging options (wired, wireless, reverse)
- Refined camera system (based on Oppo's reputation)
- Slower charging speeds compared to iQOO
- Less raw processing power than iQOO
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1318 nits, crucial for outdoor visibility. While the iQOO Neo10 Pro+'s display specs are unavailable, Oppo’s panel likely benefits from its contrast ratio of 'Infinite (nominal)', suggesting a superior viewing experience. The lack of detailed display information for the iQOO makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Find X6 Pro’s brightness advantage is a clear win for users who frequently use their phones in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed specifications are limited for the iQOO. The Oppo Find X6 Pro’s camera is known for its photo and video capabilities, though specific sensor details are missing. Without knowing the iQOO’s sensor sizes, apertures, or image processing algorithms, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Oppo’s history of camera innovation suggests a more refined and feature-rich experience. The absence of information regarding the iQOO’s camera system makes it difficult to assess its capabilities beyond speculation.
Performance
The iQOO Neo10 Pro+’s Snapdragon 8 Elite, built on a 3nm process, represents a significant leap in mobile silicon. Its octa-core configuration, featuring 2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L cores and 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M cores, promises substantially higher CPU and GPU performance compared to the Oppo Find X6 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm). The Gen 2’s 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 core is powerful, but the 8 Elite’s architecture and clock speeds suggest a clear advantage in sustained performance, particularly for gaming. However, the 4nm process of the Gen 2 offers better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during extended use.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X6 Pro’s endurance rating of 114 hours indicates excellent battery life, despite a potentially smaller battery capacity (unspecified). Its charging capabilities are versatile, offering 100W wired (100% in 30 minutes), 50W wireless (100% in 51 minutes), and 10W reverse wireless. The iQOO Neo10 Pro+ counters with an even faster 120W wired charging (70% in 25 minutes) and 100W PPS+PD, but lacks wireless charging. The iQOO’s faster wired charging is ideal for quick top-ups, while the Oppo’s wireless charging adds convenience. The Find X6 Pro’s endurance rating suggests it can comfortably last a full day, even with heavy use.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) if you need uncompromising CPU and GPU performance for demanding mobile games or applications, and value the fastest possible charging speeds. Buy the Oppo Find X6 Pro if you prefer a more refined and balanced flagship experience with excellent battery life, a potentially superior camera, and a wider range of features like wireless charging.