iQOO Neo10 Pro vs Xiaomi 13 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the iQOO Neo10 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9400 chipset, built on a 3nm process, promises a performance edge, coupled with incredibly fast 120W charging. However, the Xiaomi 13 Pro offers a refined software experience and proven stability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) | Xiaomi 13 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 29 | 2022, December 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 29 | Available. Released 2022, December 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or silicone polymer back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 75.4 x 8 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g or 206 g (7.05 oz) | 210 g or 229 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 8K, 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, 1080p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100W PPS+PD, 50% in 15 min Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 36 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6100 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Orange | Ceramic White, Ceramic Black, Ceramic Flora Green, Mountain Blue |
| Models | 2426A | 2210132G, 2210132C |
| Price | About 420 EUR | About 750 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1281666 (v9) GeekBench: 5087 (v5.1), 5323 (v6) GFXBench: 64fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China)
- Potentially superior performance with Dimensity 9400 (3nm)
- Extremely fast 120W wired charging (50% in 15 min)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Limited information on camera specifications
- Software experience may be less refined than Xiaomi
Xiaomi 13 Pro
- Proven Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance and stability
- Excellent battery life (115h endurance)
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging support
- Slightly slower wired charging (19 min to 100%)
- 4nm process may result in more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1253 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the iQOO Neo10 Pro’s display specifications are currently unavailable, it’s reasonable to expect a comparable brightness level given its flagship positioning. Both devices likely utilize high refresh rate panels, but the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks. The absence of PWM frequency data for the iQOO Neo10 Pro makes it difficult to assess its suitability for users sensitive to flicker.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are advertised as having excellent photo and video capabilities, but specific details are lacking for the iQOO Neo10 Pro. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s camera system is known for its image processing and detail capture. Without sensor size or aperture information for the iQOO Neo10 Pro, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. However, given iQOO’s focus on performance, it’s likely the camera system is optimized for speed and responsiveness. The absence of details regarding OIS on the iQOO Neo10 Pro is a notable omission.
Performance
The core of the battle lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Neo10 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400, fabricated on a 3nm process, features a unique CPU configuration with a Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.63 GHz, alongside Cortex-X4 and A720 cores. This contrasts with the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) which utilizes a Cortex-X3 prime core at 3.2 GHz. The 3nm node of the Dimensity 9400 should translate to improved power efficiency and potentially higher sustained performance under load, minimizing thermal throttling. The iQOO Neo10 Pro’s architecture suggests a focus on peak performance, while the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 prioritizes a balance of power and efficiency.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13 Pro achieves an impressive endurance rating of 115 hours and provides 10:55 hours of active use. It supports 120W wired charging, reaching 100% in 19 minutes, alongside 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless charging. The iQOO Neo10 Pro also features 120W wired charging, claiming a 50% charge in just 15 minutes, and supports 100W PPS+PD. While the Xiaomi 13 Pro offers wireless charging, the iQOO Neo10 Pro’s faster wired charging speed could be a significant advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups. The lack of battery capacity information for the iQOO Neo10 Pro makes it difficult to assess its overall battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) if you need uncompromising processing power for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and value the fastest possible charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Pro if you prefer a more polished software experience, excellent camera capabilities, and a longer-established track record of reliability, even if it means sacrificing some raw performance.