The iQOO Neo10 Pro and Realme GT Neo 5 240W represent two distinct approaches to delivering a high-performance Android experience. The iQOO leverages the cutting-edge, 3nm Mediatek Dimensity 9400, prioritizing efficiency, while the Realme GT Neo 5 240W opts for the proven Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 and a headline-grabbing 240W charging solution. This comparison dissects these choices, revealing which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and future-proofing, the iQOO Neo10 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9400 chipset, built on a 3nm process, offers superior efficiency and potential for longer-term performance stability. However, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is the clear choice for those who absolutely demand the fastest possible charging speeds.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 29 | 2023, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 29 | Available. Released 2023, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 75.4 x 8 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g or 206 g (7.05 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | Illuminated RGB (on the back) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.0, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) |
| Video | 8K, 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100W PPS+PD, 50% in 15 min
Reverse wired | 240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6100 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Orange | Purple, Black, White |
| Models | 2426A | RMX3708 |
| Price | About 420 EUR | About 440 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China)
- More efficient 3nm Dimensity 9400 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Likely improved thermal management
- Slower charging speed (120W vs 240W)
- Limited availability (China only)
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- Industry-leading 240W charging
- Proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Wider availability
- Less efficient 4nm process
- Potential for thermal throttling
- May require more frequent charging
Display Comparison
Detailed display specifications are missing, but given the market positioning, both devices likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels. The iQOO Neo10 Pro, being newer, may benefit from advancements in panel technology, potentially offering higher peak brightness and more efficient power consumption. The Realme GT Neo 5 240W likely focuses on maximizing screen-on time, while the iQOO may prioritize color accuracy and viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison. However, given the price points, both phones likely feature a primary sensor in the 50MP-100MP range. The iQOO Neo10 Pro, being a newer device, may incorporate more advanced image processing algorithms and potentially a larger sensor size for improved low-light performance. The Realme GT Neo 5 240W may prioritize video recording capabilities, leveraging the Snapdragon’s ISP.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Neo10 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400, fabricated on a 3nm process, is architecturally more advanced than the Realme GT Neo 5 240W’s 4nm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. The Dimensity 9400’s Cortex-X925 core, coupled with the X4 cores, suggests a focus on both peak and sustained performance. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while powerful, is known to generate more heat under prolonged load, potentially leading to thermal throttling. The iQOO’s CPU configuration (1x3.63 GHz, 3x3.3 GHz, 4x2.4 GHz) indicates a wider performance spread than the Realme’s (1x3.19 GHz, 3x2.75 GHz, 4x1.80 GHz), potentially benefiting multitasking and demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo 5 240W’s 240W charging is its standout feature, achieving a 50% charge in just 4 minutes and 100% in 10 minutes. The iQOO Neo10 Pro’s 120W charging is still very fast, reaching 50% in 15 minutes, but significantly slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Realme’s aggressive charging suggests a smaller battery to facilitate faster fill times. The iQOO, with its more efficient chipset, may be able to achieve comparable battery life with a slightly smaller capacity, but the Realme’s charging speed is unmatched.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) if you need a phone that balances raw power with exceptional efficiency, offering a smoother long-term experience and potentially better thermal management. Buy the Realme GT Neo 5 240W if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging speeds available, and are willing to potentially trade off some sustained performance and efficiency for that convenience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Realme GT Neo 5 240W overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to generate significant heat under sustained load. While Realme likely implements cooling solutions, users may experience some thermal throttling during prolonged gaming, potentially leading to reduced frame rates. The iQOO Neo10 Pro’s Dimensity 9400, with its 3nm process, is expected to manage heat more effectively.
❓ How does the 120W charging on the iQOO Neo10 Pro compare to the 240W charging on the Realme GT Neo 5 240W in real-world usage?
While 120W is fast, 240W is significantly faster. The Realme GT Neo 5 240W can achieve a full charge in approximately 10 minutes, while the iQOO Neo10 Pro takes around 15 minutes to reach 50% and longer for a full charge. This difference is most noticeable for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Is the Mediatek Dimensity 9400 chipset in the iQOO Neo10 Pro comparable to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in terms of gaming performance?
The Dimensity 9400 is positioned as a flagship-level chipset and is expected to deliver performance comparable to, and in some cases exceeding, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. Its advanced architecture and 3nm process contribute to both raw power and efficiency, making it a strong contender for demanding gaming applications.
