iQOO Neo10 Pro vs Oppo Find X6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and blazing-fast 120W charging, the iQOO Neo10 Pro is the clear winner. However, the Oppo Find X6 Pro offers a more polished experience with its excellent display, potentially superior camera processing, and proven endurance, making it the better all-rounder for most consumers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) | Oppo Find X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 29 | 2023, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 29 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 75.4 x 8 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 164.8 x 76.2 x 9.1 mm or 9.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g or 206 g (7.05 oz) | 216 g or 218 g (7.62 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO3 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1500 nits (HBM), 2500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 8K, 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100W PPS+PD, 50% in 15 min Reverse wired | 100W wired, PD, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 30 min 50W wireless, 50% in 22 min, 100% in 51 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6100 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Orange | Black, Green, Brown |
| Models | 2426A | PGEM110, PGEM10 |
| Price | About 420 EUR | About 820 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1294797 (v9) GeekBench: 4791 (v5.1), 5226 (v6) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China)
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Potentially superior CPU performance with Dimensity 9400
- Likely more aggressive pricing
- Camera specs are unknown, potential for lower image quality
- Brand recognition is lower than Oppo
Oppo Find X6 Pro
- Brighter display with infinite contrast ratio
- Excellent battery life and wireless charging options
- Potentially superior camera system and image processing
- Slower wired charging compared to iQOO Neo10 Pro
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is a generation behind the Dimensity 9400
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1318 nits, ensuring excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the iQOO Neo10 Pro’s display specs are not provided, the Find X6 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a superior viewing experience. The Find X6 Pro’s panel likely utilizes LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, contributing to better power efficiency, a feature not confirmed for the iQOO. This makes the Find X6 Pro the better choice for media consumption and outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are described as having capable photo/video systems, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the iQOO Neo10 Pro. The Oppo Find X6 Pro likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms, leveraging Oppo’s expertise in computational photography. While the iQOO may offer competitive specs, the Find X6 Pro’s established track record and likely superior software optimization give it an edge in image quality and versatility. The absence of details on the iQOO’s camera system makes a definitive comparison difficult, but the Find X6 Pro is the safer bet for photography enthusiasts.
Performance
The iQOO Neo10 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400, built on a 3nm process, promises a substantial performance leap over the Oppo Find X6 Pro’s 4nm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. The Dimensity 9400’s Cortex-X925 core, clocked at 3.63 GHz, is expected to outperform the Snapdragon’s Cortex-X3 at 3.2 GHz. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 benefits from Qualcomm’s mature software optimization and thermal management. The iQOO’s performance advantage will be most noticeable in sustained workloads, but the Snapdragon’s efficiency could lead to less throttling during extended gaming sessions. The iQOO’s RAM configuration (not specified) will also play a role, but LPDDR5x is expected on both devices.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X6 Pro has an endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the iQOO Neo10 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its 120W wired charging significantly outpaces the Oppo’s 100W charging, achieving 50% charge in just 15 minutes. The Oppo offers 100% charge in 30 minutes, 50W wireless charging (100% in 51 minutes), and 10W reverse wireless. The iQOO also offers 100W PPS+PD and reverse wired charging. The iQOO’s faster charging is ideal for users who frequently need to top up quickly, while the Oppo’s endurance and wireless charging options provide greater convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro (China) if you need uncompromising CPU performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and value the fastest possible charging speeds. Buy the Oppo Find X6 Pro if you prefer a more balanced flagship experience with a focus on camera quality, display brightness, and long-term battery reliability, even if it means sacrificing some peak processing power.