iQOO Neo10 vs Oppo Reno10 Pro+: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Snapdragon Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the iQOO Neo10 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers a significant leap in CPU and GPU capabilities over the Reno10 Pro+'s 8+ Gen 1. While the Reno10 Pro+ offers a refined experience, the Neo10’s superior chipset justifies the trade-offs for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo10 (China) | Oppo Reno10 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 29 | 2023, May 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 29 | Available. Released 2023, May 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 75.4 x 8 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.41 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g or 206 g (7.05 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, ColorOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.5, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 8K, 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100W PPS+PD, 50% in 15 min Reverse wired | 100W wired, PD, QC3 Reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6100 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Orange | Silvery Grey, Glossy Purple, Gold |
| Models | 2425A, V2425A | PHU110, CPH2521 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 540 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo10 (China)
- Significantly faster charging (120W)
- More powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset
- Likely better gaming performance
- Potentially less refined camera image processing
- Brand recognition may be lower outside of China
Oppo Reno10 Pro+
- Potentially superior camera system and image processing
- Refined software experience
- Established brand reputation
- Slower charging speed (100W)
- Less powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the Reno10 Pro+'s positioning, it likely features a high-refresh-rate AMOLED panel, potentially with LTPO technology for variable refresh rates and improved efficiency. The iQOO Neo10, targeting a more value-conscious segment, may utilize a standard high-refresh-rate AMOLED. The Reno10 Pro+ likely benefits from Oppo’s color calibration expertise, potentially offering more accurate color reproduction out of the box. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, reflecting current design trends.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, analysis is limited. However, the Reno10 Pro+ is likely to prioritize camera capabilities, potentially featuring a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. Oppo’s MariSilicon X NPU, if present, would further enhance image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The iQOO Neo10, while likely equipped with a capable camera system, may focus more on computational photography to compensate for potentially smaller sensors. The Reno10 Pro+'s image processing style is likely geared towards more vibrant and social-media-friendly results, while the Neo10 might aim for greater accuracy.
Performance
The iQOO Neo10’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Reno10 Pro+'s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The 8 Gen 3’s new Cortex-X4 prime core, clocked at 3.3 GHz, delivers significantly improved single-core performance compared to the 8+ Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 at 3.0 GHz. The 8 Gen 3 also features newer Cortex-A720 performance cores, enhancing multi-core workloads. While both chips are built on a 4nm process, the architectural improvements in the 8 Gen 3 translate to better performance and efficiency. The Neo10 will excel in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, while the Reno10 Pro+ will still provide a smooth experience for everyday use. The Neo10’s LPDDR5x RAM will further contribute to faster data access and improved responsiveness.
Battery Life
The iQOO Neo10’s 120W wired charging is a significant advantage, promising a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. This is considerably faster than the Reno10 Pro+'s 100W charging. While the Reno10 Pro+ supports PD and QC3, the Neo10’s inclusion of 100W PPS+PD offers broader compatibility and potentially faster charging with compatible chargers. Battery capacity is not specified, but the faster charging speed of the Neo10 mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. Both devices offer reverse wired charging, adding to their versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo10 (China) if you need uncompromising processing power for demanding games, content creation, or heavy multitasking. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ensures longevity and top-tier performance. Buy the Oppo Reno10 Pro+ if you prefer a more balanced experience with a focus on refined software, potentially better camera image processing, and a slightly more established brand reputation, accepting a performance step down.