The iQOO Neo, powered by the Snapdragon 845, represents a mature, albeit older, generation of flagship-adjacent performance. The Redmi K70 Ultra, with its cutting-edge Dimensity 9300+ chipset, aims to redefine what's possible in the mid-range. This comparison dissects the core differences, helping you determine if the newer technology justifies the potential price premium.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and raw performance, the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset offers a substantial leap over the iQOO Neo’s Snapdragon 845, coupled with significantly faster 120W charging. While the iQOO Neo remains a capable device, it’s showing its age.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, July. Released 2019, July | 2024, July 19 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2024, July 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 75.2 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) | 211 g (7.44 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Scratch/drop-resistant glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 99.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | OLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 630 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 64GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.28µm | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 32-bit/192kHz audio
| - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 24 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple | Black, White, Violet, Green Championship Edition, Orange Championship Edition |
| Models | V1914A | 2407FRK8EC |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 330 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable and proven Snapdragon 845 performance
- Familiar Android experience
- Slow 22.5W charging
- Older chipset prone to throttling
- Likely LCD display with lower brightness
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Ultra
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Powerful and efficient Dimensity 9300+ chipset
- Likely AMOLED display with superior visuals
- Higher price compared to the iQOO Neo
- Potential for software bloat (typical of Xiaomi)
- May require a more powerful charger (sold separately)
Display Comparison
Context data lacks display specifics for both devices. However, given the iQOO Neo’s release timeframe, it likely features an LCD panel, while the Redmi K70 Ultra, being a more recent model, almost certainly utilizes AMOLED technology. The Redmi K70 Ultra likely benefits from higher peak brightness and superior contrast ratios. The K70 Ultra’s newer panel tech likely includes a higher refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and gaming experiences. Bezels are expected to be slimmer on the K70 Ultra, reflecting advancements in display manufacturing.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Redmi K70 Ultra’s positioning, it’s reasonable to expect a more advanced camera system. The K70 Ultra likely features a larger main sensor with a wider aperture, resulting in better low-light performance and improved dynamic range. The Dimensity 9300+ also includes a more capable ISP (Image Signal Processor) for enhanced image processing. The iQOO Neo’s camera will likely be adequate for casual photography, but the K70 Ultra should deliver noticeably superior image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Neo’s Snapdragon 845 (10nm) was a flagship processor in its time, featuring an octa-core configuration peaking at 2.8 GHz. However, the Redmi K70 Ultra’s Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) represents a significant architectural upgrade. The 4nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal performance. The Dimensity 9300+'s CPU configuration – a 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 – provides a substantial performance advantage in both single-core and multi-core tasks. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and significantly improved gaming performance. The iQOO Neo will likely exhibit throttling under sustained load, while the K70 Ultra’s superior thermal efficiency should mitigate this issue.
Battery Life
The iQOO Neo’s 22.5W wired charging is comparatively slow. The Redmi K70 Ultra’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, capable of fully charging the device in approximately 24 minutes. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the K70 Ultra significantly reduces downtime. The 4nm process of the Dimensity 9300+ also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting any capacity difference. Users who frequently top up their phones or need a quick boost will greatly benefit from the K70 Ultra’s charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo if you need a reliable, still-capable smartphone at a potentially lower price point and aren't demanding the absolute latest in processing power. It's a good choice for everyday tasks and light gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Ultra if you prioritize performance for demanding games, content creation, and want the convenience of incredibly fast charging, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 845 in the iQOO Neo struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 845 will likely struggle with Genshin Impact at higher settings. Expect noticeable frame drops and potential thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Dimensity 9300+ in the Redmi K70 Ultra is far better equipped to handle such titles smoothly.
❓ Does the Redmi K70 Ultra's 120W charging degrade the battery health over time?
While fast charging can theoretically contribute to battery degradation, modern smartphones employ sophisticated charging algorithms to mitigate this effect. Xiaomi's 120W charging includes features like dynamic battery management to optimize charging speed and protect long-term battery health. However, some degradation is inevitable over years of use, regardless of charging speed.
❓ Is the performance difference between the two phones noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For basic tasks like browsing and social media, the difference won't be dramatically noticeable. However, the Redmi K70 Ultra will feel snappier and more responsive when switching between apps or handling multiple tasks simultaneously due to its more powerful processor and faster RAM.
