Both the vivo iQOO Neo 855 and the Realme X2 Pro represent a sweet spot in the smartphone market – powerful performance from the Snapdragon 855 series at a more accessible price point. Released around the same time, they cater to users seeking flagship-level capabilities without the flagship price tag. This comparison dissects their key differences, focusing on performance, charging, and overall user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a slightly more refined chipset, the Realme X2 Pro is the better choice. Its 50W SuperVOOC charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 855+ offers a modest performance uplift. However, the iQOO Neo 855 remains a compelling option for budget-conscious gamers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - China |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - EMEA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, October. Released 2019, October | 2019, October 15. Released 2019, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 75.2 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 161 x 75.7 x 8.7 mm (6.34 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 99.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | 64GB 6GB RAM (UFS 2.1), all others (UFS 3.0) | 64GB UFS 2.1, 128/256GB UFS 3.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
13 MP, f/2.5, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with Dolby Atmos stereo speakers (2 dedicated amplifiers) |
| | 32-bit/192kHz audio
| 24-bit/192kHz audio (incl. speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 50W wired, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Purple, Aurora White, Black | Lunar White, Neptune Blue, Red Master Edition, Gray Master Edition |
| Models | V1936A, V1936T | RMX1931 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -91.3dB / Crosstalk -92.5dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 94h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 82dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 91dB
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 396827 (v7), 467653 (v8)
GeekBench: 10373 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 37fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo 855
- More affordable price point
- Clean and streamlined software experience (likely)
- Respectable performance for everyday tasks
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Slightly less powerful chipset (Snapdragon 855)
Realme X2 Pro
- Faster 50W SuperVOOC charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 855+ chipset
- Potentially better camera system
- Generally higher price than the iQOO Neo 855
- Realme UI may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
Both devices share a similar 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting both utilize AMOLED panels. However, specific details like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing. Given the market positioning, it's likely both offer vibrant colors and good viewing angles. The Realme X2 Pro, being slightly higher positioned, *may* have a marginally better calibrated display, but without specific data, this remains speculative. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of devices from this era.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific sensor details. Given Realme’s history, the X2 Pro likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger primary sensor and potentially more advanced image processing algorithms. The iQOO Neo 855 likely prioritizes value, potentially sacrificing some camera features for a lower price point. Without sensor size or aperture information, a detailed comparison is impossible, but the X2 Pro likely offers better low-light performance and overall image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipset: the iQOO Neo 855 features the Snapdragon 855 (7nm), while the Realme X2 Pro boasts the Snapdragon 855+ (7nm). The '+’ variant offers a slightly higher clock speed – 2.96 GHz on the X2 Pro versus 2.84 GHz on the iQOO Neo 855 – and a modestly improved GPU. This translates to a small but noticeable performance advantage for the X2 Pro in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. Both utilize an octa-core configuration with the same Kryo 485 architecture, but the X2 Pro’s higher clock speeds will result in faster processing times. Both likely feature ample RAM for smooth multitasking, though specific configurations weren't provided.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both devices achieve an endurance rating of 94 hours, despite differing charging speeds. The Realme X2 Pro’s 50W SuperVOOC charging is a significant advantage, promising a full charge in just 35 minutes. The iQOO Neo 855’s 33W charging is respectable, but considerably slower. This difference in charging speed is a key differentiator, particularly for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery. The similar endurance ratings suggest comparable battery optimization and power efficiency despite the chipset differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo 855 if you prioritize a balance of performance and affordability, and aren't overly concerned with the absolute fastest charging speeds. It's ideal for everyday tasks, moderate gaming, and users who appreciate a clean software experience. Buy the Realme X2 Pro if you demand the quickest possible charging, a slightly more powerful processor for sustained workloads, and are comfortable with Realme UI. This phone is geared towards power users and those who frequently find themselves needing to top up their battery quickly.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 855+ in the Realme X2 Pro offer a noticeable gaming advantage over the standard 855 in the iQOO Neo 855?
While the difference isn't massive, the Snapdragon 855+ in the X2 Pro provides a slight edge in sustained gaming performance. The higher clock speeds and optimized GPU allow for slightly higher frame rates and better thermal management during extended gaming sessions. However, both phones are capable of running most mobile games at high settings.
❓ How significant is the charging speed difference between 33W and 50W, and will I really notice it?
The difference is substantial. 50W SuperVOOC charging on the Realme X2 Pro can fully charge the phone in approximately 35 minutes, while the iQOO Neo 855’s 33W charging will take considerably longer – likely over an hour. This is a critical factor for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day.
❓ Are there any known thermal throttling issues with either the iQOO Neo 855 or the Realme X2 Pro under heavy load?
Both devices utilize the Snapdragon 855 series, which was known to run warm under sustained load. While neither phone is prone to *severe* throttling, the Realme X2 Pro’s slightly improved thermal design and the 855+’s efficiency gains may result in marginally better sustained performance during demanding tasks.
