iQOO Neo 855 vs OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 855 Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and 5G connectivity, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren edges out the iQOO Neo 855. The Snapdragon 855+ offers a slight performance boost, and the McLaren branding hints at a more refined software experience. However, the iQOO Neo 855 remains a compelling option for budget-conscious gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo 855 | OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 71 SA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, October. Released 2019, October | 2019, October 23. Released 2019, November 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 75.2 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 162.6 x 75.9 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~516 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 99.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10 | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| 64GB 6GB RAM (UFS 2.1), all others (UFS 3.0) | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4085 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Purple, Aurora White, Black | Papaya Orange |
| Models | V1936A, V1936T | HD1925 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 800 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo 855
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Potentially better value for money
- Strong gaming performance with Snapdragon 855
- Snapdragon 855 is slightly less powerful than 855+
- Potentially less refined software experience
OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren
- Slightly more powerful Snapdragon 855+
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Potentially better camera system
- Slower 30W wired charging
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays (based on market positioning), specific details like peak brightness and color accuracy are absent. However, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren’s fluid AMOLED panel was known for its excellent color calibration. The iQOO Neo 855, being a more value-focused device, may have slightly less accurate color reproduction. Bezels are likely comparable, given the similar design language of the era. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rate scaling isn't as efficient as on newer panels.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, positioned as a premium device, likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger primary sensor and potentially better image stabilization (OIS). The iQOO Neo 855 likely prioritizes value, potentially sacrificing some camera quality for a lower price point. Image processing styles will also differ; OnePlus typically aims for a more natural look, while vivo often employs more vibrant, saturated colors. The inclusion of low-resolution macro lenses on both devices is largely a marketing gimmick and shouldn't heavily influence purchasing decisions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the iQOO Neo 855 utilizes the Snapdragon 855, while the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren boasts the Snapdragon 855+. The ‘+’ variant features slightly higher clock speeds – 2.96 GHz vs 2.84 GHz on the primary Kryo 485 core – translating to a marginal performance increase in CPU-intensive tasks. Both share the same GPU architecture, but the 855+ benefits from optimized drivers. The iQOO Neo 855’s thermal management will be crucial; the 855 was known to run warm, and efficient cooling is vital to sustain peak performance. Both likely utilize LPDDR4X RAM, impacting multitasking speeds.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified, but both phones likely fall in the 3500-4000 mAh range. The key differentiator is charging speed: the iQOO Neo 855 supports 33W wired charging, while the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren is limited to 30W. This 3W difference translates to a faster 0-100% charge time on the iQOO Neo 855, a significant advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups. However, real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns and software optimization.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo 855 if you need a powerful gaming phone on a tighter budget and prioritize faster charging speeds. Its 33W charging will get you back in the game quicker. Buy the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren if you prefer a more polished user experience, benefit from the slightly enhanced Snapdragon 855+ performance, and require seamless 5G connectivity for streaming and downloads.