The vivo iQOO Neo 855 and Motorola One Action represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The iQOO Neo 855 prioritizes performance with a flagship-level Snapdragon 855 chipset, while the Motorola One Action focuses on all-day battery life and a practical camera system. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding applications, the vivo iQOO Neo 855 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 855 offers significantly superior processing power. However, the Motorola One Action provides excellent battery endurance and a more balanced experience for everyday tasks, making it a strong contender for those seeking longevity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 38, 41, 66 - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, October. Released 2019, October | 2019, August 16. Released 2019, October 31 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 75.2 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 160.1 x 71.2 x 9.2 mm (6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~404 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~432 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 99.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 94.0 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10 | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Exynos 9609 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | 64GB 6GB RAM (UFS 2.1), all others (UFS 3.0) | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Auxiliary lens | 12 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.25µm, PDAF
16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), dedicated video camera (1080p)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 12 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.25µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 32-bit/192kHz audio
| - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE, EDR |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Purple, Aurora White, Black | Denim Blue, Pearl White, Aqua Teal |
| Models | V1936A, V1936T | XT2013-1, XT2013-2, XT2013-4 |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -93.7dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 66h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1237:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 67dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 84dB
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 148748 (v7)
GeekBench: 5271 (v4.4) |
vivo iQOO Neo 855
- Significantly faster processor for gaming and demanding apps
- 33W fast charging for quick top-ups
- Likely superior display quality (brightness, color accuracy)
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- May run hotter during prolonged gaming sessions
Motorola One Action
- Excellent battery endurance (66h rating)
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- Slow 10W charging
- Less powerful processor for gaming and demanding apps
Display Comparison
The Motorola One Action boasts a contrast ratio of 1237:1 and a measured peak brightness of 459 nits. While respectable, this is likely overshadowed by the iQOO Neo 855, which, though lacking specific display data, typically features panels with higher brightness and color accuracy given its positioning. The iQOO Neo 855 likely benefits from a more vibrant display experience, though the Motorola's contrast ratio is adequate for most viewing conditions. The absence of refresh rate data for both phones suggests neither prioritizes smooth scrolling.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but details are limited. The iQOO Neo 855, positioned as a gaming phone, often includes camera features geared towards content creation, though specific sensor details are missing. The Motorola One Action’s camera system is likely focused on providing reliable image quality in various lighting conditions. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the iQOO Neo 855’s association with a more performance-driven brand suggests a more feature-rich camera experience. The lack of detail on both sides makes a direct comparison challenging, but the iQOO Neo 855 likely has the edge in processing power for image enhancement.
Performance
The iQOO Neo 855’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7nm) chipset is the dominant force here. Its octa-core configuration, with a prime Kryo 485 core clocked at 2.84 GHz, delivers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance compared to the Motorola One Action’s Exynos 9609 (10nm). The Exynos 9609, with its Cortex-A73 cores peaking at 2.2 GHz, is geared towards efficiency rather than outright speed. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a superior gaming experience on the iQOO Neo 855. The 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 855 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 66 hours, suggesting comparable battery life in typical usage scenarios. However, the charging speeds differ dramatically. The iQOO Neo 855 supports 33W wired charging, allowing for significantly faster top-ups compared to the Motorola One Action’s slow 10W charging. This means the iQOO Neo 855 can recover a substantial amount of battery life in a short period, while the Motorola One Action requires a much longer charging time. While both may last a day, the iQOO Neo 855 offers convenience with its faster charging capability.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo 855 if you need a phone capable of handling graphically intensive games and applications without compromise, and fast charging is a priority. Buy the Motorola One Action if you prefer a phone that can reliably last a full day on a single charge, and you value a practical camera experience over raw processing power. The Motorola is ideal for users who don't push their phones to the limit.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 9609 in the Motorola One Action tend to overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Exynos 9609 is a relatively efficient chip, but it's not designed for sustained high performance like the Snapdragon 855. While it won't likely shut down, you may experience some thermal throttling and reduced frame rates during prolonged gaming. It's best suited for casual gaming rather than demanding titles at maximum settings.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the iQOO Neo 855 with its 33W fast charging?
With 33W charging, the iQOO Neo 855 can typically go from 0% to 100% in approximately 60-75 minutes, depending on the charger and battery condition. This is a significant improvement over the Motorola One Action's much slower 10W charging, which could take over 3 hours for a full charge.
❓ Is the Motorola One Action's camera suitable for low-light photography?
Without specific aperture or sensor size details, it's difficult to say definitively. However, Motorola typically optimizes its camera software for reliable performance in various conditions. Expect decent low-light results, but don't expect the same level of detail or dynamic range as phones with larger sensors and dedicated night modes.
❓ Can the iQOO Neo 855 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile at high frame rates?
Yes, the Snapdragon 855 is more than capable of running PUBG Mobile at high frame rates (60fps or higher) with high graphics settings. The iQOO Neo 855's processing power and thermal management system are designed to handle such demanding games without significant performance drops.
