The iQOO Neo 7 and Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The iQOO Neo 7 prioritizes blazing-fast 120W charging and a newer MediaTek Dimensity 8200 chipset, while the Poco F5 Pro counters with the proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 and a bright, high-contrast display. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro emerges as the stronger all-rounder. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers consistently high performance, and the 99-hour endurance rating suggests excellent battery life. While the iQOO Neo 7’s charging is faster, the Poco F5 Pro’s overall package provides a more balanced experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - India | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 16 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 16 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.34 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| | Always-on display | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 25 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Interstellar Black, Frost Blue | Black, White |
| Models | I2214 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 440 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo 7
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Modern MediaTek Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Potentially more efficient CPU architecture
- Battery life likely inferior to Poco F5 Pro
- Display brightness likely lower than Poco F5 Pro
- Camera specifications unknown
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Excellent 99-hour battery endurance
- Brighter display (1059 nits)
- Slower 67W wired charging
- Wireless charging may not be preferred by all
- Camera specifications unknown
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1059 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the iQOO Neo 7. This translates to better visibility outdoors. Both displays feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks, but the Poco F5 Pro’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage. While neither specification details refresh rate or panel type, the Poco F5 Pro’s brightness is a key differentiator for users who consume a lot of HDR content or use their phones in bright sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. However, the absence of any mention of megapixel counts or sensor sizes suggests a focus on software optimization rather than hardware prowess. Without further information, it’s difficult to definitively say which camera system is superior. We can assume both will offer competent performance in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will likely depend on sensor size and image processing algorithms, which remain unknown.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the iQOO Neo 7 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4nm), while the Poco F5 Pro features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, with its Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, generally delivers higher peak performance in demanding tasks. However, the Dimensity 8200’s architecture, with its three Cortex-A78 cores, provides strong multi-core performance. Both are built on a 4nm process, indicating good efficiency, but the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 has a proven track record for sustained performance and thermal management in flagship devices. The Poco F5 Pro’s LPDDR5X RAM (speculation based on market segment) likely contributes to faster data transfer speeds compared to the iQOO Neo 7’s RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 Pro’s 99-hour endurance rating is a significant advantage, indicating excellent battery life. While the iQOO Neo 7’s battery capacity is unspecified, its 120W wired charging is its standout feature, achieving 50% charge in just 10 minutes and 100% in 25 minutes. The Poco F5 Pro’s 67W charging (with PD3.0 and QC3+ support) is slower, taking 15 minutes for 50%, but it also offers 30W wireless charging (50% in 32 minutes), a feature absent on the iQOO Neo 7. The trade-off is speed versus longevity; the iQOO Neo 7 gets you back to 100% faster, while the Poco F5 Pro keeps you going longer on a single charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo 7 if you absolutely prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and frequently top up your phone throughout the day. Its 120W charging is a game-changer for minimizing downtime. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you value sustained performance, a brighter display, and longer battery life between charges, making it ideal for gamers and media consumers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro throttle during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known for its efficient thermal management. While some throttling is inevitable during prolonged, demanding gaming, the 4nm process and Qualcomm’s optimizations minimize this effect, providing a consistently high frame rate for longer periods compared to older chipsets.
❓ How much faster is the iQOO Neo 7's 120W charging in real-world use compared to the Poco F5 Pro's 67W charging?
The iQOO Neo 7's 120W charging is significantly faster, fully charging the phone in 25 minutes versus the Poco F5 Pro's longer charging time. This is most beneficial for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery, even if only for a short period.
❓ Does the Poco F5 Pro support high refresh rate gaming, and what frame rates can be expected in popular titles like PUBG Mobile?
While the specification doesn't explicitly state the display refresh rate, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is capable of driving high refresh rate displays. Expect smooth gameplay at 60fps or higher in PUBG Mobile, potentially reaching 90fps depending on the game settings and optimization.
