The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the iQOO Neo 7 and Xiaomi Poco F5 are two of the hottest contenders. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but cater to slightly different user needs. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO Neo 7 takes the crown for charging speed and raw performance thanks to its Dimensity 8200 chipset. However, the Poco F5 boasts a brighter display, longer battery life, and a more refined overall experience, making it a strong contender for everyday use. It depends on your priorities!
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - India | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 16 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 16 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.34 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| | Always-on display | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 25 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Interstellar Black, Frost Blue | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | I2214 | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 440 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
vivo iQOO Neo 7
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Smooth gaming performance
- Good value for money
- Battery life could be better
- Camera slightly behind Poco F5
- Design might not appeal to everyone
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Excellent battery life
- Bright and vibrant display
- Refined camera performance
- Competitive price
- Slower charging speed
- Performance slightly behind iQOO Neo 7
- Design is somewhat generic
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 shines with its 963 nits peak brightness, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. Its contrast ratio is also impressive. The iQOO Neo 7's display is good, but doesn't quite reach the same level of brightness or contrast. Both use AMOLED panels with smooth refresh rates, so viewing experience is generally excellent.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Poco F5 seems to have a slight edge in image quality, particularly in well-lit conditions. The iQOO Neo 7's camera is still very good, but the Poco F5's image processing appears more refined. Video recording capabilities are comparable on both devices.
Performance
The iQOO Neo 7's Mediatek Dimensity 8200 generally edges out the Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 in raw processing power, particularly in demanding games. Both chips are capable of handling everyday tasks with ease, but the Neo 7 offers a slight performance advantage. The Dimensity 8200's 4nm process also contributes to efficient power usage.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 clearly wins in the battery department. Its endurance rating of 118h is significantly higher than what's typically expected. The iQOO Neo 7's 120W charging is incredibly fast, but it needs to be charged more frequently due to its smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Neo 7 is ideal for gamers and power users who prioritize fast charging and a smooth, responsive experience. The Xiaomi Poco F5 is a better choice for those who value battery life, a vibrant display, and a more balanced overall package.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The iQOO Neo 7 generally offers slightly better gaming performance due to its more powerful chipset.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone?
The iQOO Neo 7 charges from 0% to 100% in approximately 25 minutes with its 120W charger, while the Poco F5 takes around 46 minutes with its 67W charger.
❓ Which phone has better speakers?
Both phones have stereo speakers, but reviews suggest the Poco F5 has slightly better audio quality and loudness.
