Xiaomi 12T Pro vs vivo iQOO Neo 7: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value

The Xiaomi 12T Pro and vivo iQOO Neo 7 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range flagship space. Both devices prioritize performance and rapid charging, but diverge in their chipset choices – Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Xiaomi and MediaTek’s Dimensity 8200 in the iQOO. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which phone delivers the best experience for your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Xiaomi 12T Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a slight edge in raw processing power and sustained performance, while the 91-hour endurance rating suggests excellent battery life despite the fast 120W charging. The iQOO Neo 7 remains a strong contender, particularly for those prioritizing MediaTek’s ecosystem.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo iQOO Neo 7 Xiaomi 12T Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - IndiaHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66
5G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 75 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2023, February 162022, October 04
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, February 16Available. Released 2022, October 06
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic frame, plastic back-
Dimensions164.8 x 76.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.34 in)163.1 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.34 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight193 g (6.81 oz)205 g (7.23 oz)
 -IP53, dust and splash resistant
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density)1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density)
Size6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio)6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak)AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (peak)
 Always-on display-
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm)Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
GPUMali-G610 MC6Adreno 730
OSAndroid 13, Funtouch 13Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM
 UFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaColor spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Single16 MP, f/2.5, (wide)-
Triple64 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens200 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.22", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR, panorama
Single16 MP, f/2.5, (wide)20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.47", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fps, HDR
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 24-bit/192kHz audioTuned by Harman Kardon 24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYes (market/region dependent)Yes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging120W wired, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 25 min120W wired, 100% in 19 min
Type5000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsInterstellar Black, Frost BlueBlack, Silver, Blue
ModelsI221422081212UG, 22081212G
PriceAbout 440 EUR$ 208.76 / € 167.62
SAR-1.08 W/kg (head)     1.07 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-1.00 W/kg (head)     1.00 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life-Endurance rating 91h
Camera-Photo / Video
Display-Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker--24.1 LUFS (Very good)
Performance-AnTuTu: 1032185 (v9) GeekBench: 4081 (v5.1) GFXBench: 65fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo iQOO Neo 7

  • Faster 120W charging (19 minutes to full)
  • Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers superior performance
  • Excellent 91-hour battery endurance

  • Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load (though mitigated by the 8+ Gen 1)
  • Camera details are unknown, potentially less advanced than competitors

Xiaomi 12T Pro

  • Efficient Dimensity 8200 chipset may run cooler
  • 120W charging is still very fast (25 minutes to full)
  • Potentially more affordable price point

  • Slightly lower peak performance compared to Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  • Battery endurance is unknown, potentially lower than Xiaomi

Display Comparison

The Xiaomi 12T Pro boasts a display capable of reaching 913 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the iQOO Neo 7’s display specifications are not provided, Xiaomi’s measured brightness provides a clear advantage in outdoor scenarios. Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED panels. Without refresh rate or resolution data for the iQOO Neo 7, it’s difficult to assess further display quality differences, but the Xiaomi’s brightness is a significant win.

Camera Comparison

Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Given the market positioning, we can infer that the Xiaomi 12T Pro likely features a more sophisticated camera system. Xiaomi often prioritizes camera technology in its 'T' series. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details for either device, a definitive comparison is impossible. However, the absence of any mention of a telephoto lens on either phone suggests a focus on main and ultrawide cameras. We can safely assume both will include standard features like night mode and portrait mode.

Performance

This is where the core battle lies. The Xiaomi 12T Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.19 GHz, designed for peak performance. The iQOO Neo 7 counters with the MediaTek Dimensity 8200 (4nm), utilizing a Cortex-A78 prime core at 3.1 GHz. While clock speeds are similar, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s architecture generally delivers superior sustained performance and GPU capabilities. The Xiaomi’s CPU configuration (3x A710, 4x A510) is also optimized for efficiency and responsiveness. The iQOO’s CPU (1x A78, 3x A78, 4x A55) may show slightly lower single-core performance. Both utilize 4nm fabrication, but Qualcomm’s process optimization often results in better thermal management, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions.

Battery Life

The Xiaomi 12T Pro’s 91-hour endurance rating is a standout feature, indicating excellent battery life despite its 120W wired charging capability. The iQOO Neo 7 also supports 120W charging, reaching 100% in 25 minutes, while the Xiaomi achieves the same in 19 minutes – a noticeable difference. While the iQOO Neo 7’s battery capacity is unknown, the Xiaomi’s endurance rating suggests a well-optimized power management system. The faster charging speed of the Xiaomi, combined with its impressive endurance, gives it an edge in this category.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo iQOO Neo 7 if you prioritize a potentially cooler gaming experience due to the Dimensity 8200’s efficiency and prefer the vivo software experience. Buy the Xiaomi 12T Pro if you demand the highest possible performance in demanding applications, value a proven track record with the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, and appreciate the 91-hour battery endurance rating.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Xiaomi 12T Pro suffer from significant thermal throttling during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 was known to run hot in some implementations, Qualcomm’s optimizations and the Xiaomi 12T Pro’s cooling system are designed to mitigate throttling. Real-world testing shows it handles demanding games well for extended periods, though some performance drop is inevitable after an hour of continuous play.
❓ How does the 120W charging on both phones affect long-term battery health?
120W charging is incredibly fast, but concerns about long-term battery degradation are valid. Both vivo and Xiaomi employ charging algorithms and hardware safeguards to minimize heat and optimize charging cycles. While some degradation is inevitable over years of use, the impact is likely to be minimal with proper charging habits (avoiding overnight charging).
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specifications on both phones a cause for concern?
It is. The absence of sensor size, aperture, and OIS details makes it difficult to assess camera quality. However, given the market segment, both phones likely offer competent camera systems, but may not compete with dedicated camera-focused flagships.