The vivo iQOO Neo series has consistently delivered impressive performance and features at competitive prices. Today, we're pitting the latest iQOO Neo 7 against its predecessor, the iQOO Neo 6, to see which one offers the best value and overall experience. Both phones target mobile gamers, but significant upgrades exist.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO Neo 7 takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster charging, more powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset, and improved overall performance. While the Neo 6 boasts excellent battery life and a great display, the Neo 7's advancements make it the better choice for most users, especially gamers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - India | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 16 | 2022, May 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 16 | Available. Released 2022, May 31 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.34 in) | 163 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| | Always-on display | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 25 min | 80W wired, 50% in 12 min, 100% in 32 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Interstellar Black, Frost Blue | Dark Nova, Cyber Rage |
| Models | I2214 | I2126 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 97h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.0 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 627246 (v8), 730223 (v9)
GeekBench: 3076 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo 7
- Significantly faster charging (120W)
- More powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Improved performance in demanding games
- Modern design
- Potentially slightly shorter battery life than Neo 6
- Price is higher than Neo 6
vivo iQOO Neo 6
- Exceptional battery life (97h endurance rating)
- Reliable Snapdragon 870 performance
- Excellent display with high contrast
- More affordable
- Slower charging speed (80W)
- Older chipset compared to Neo 7
- May show its age in future demanding games
Display Comparison
The iQOO Neo 6 features a contrast ratio of 'Infinite' (nominal), suggesting excellent blacks and vibrant colors. It also boasts a measured peak brightness of 772 nits, which is quite good. The Neo 7 likely has a similar quality AMOLED display, but specific brightness figures are needed for a direct comparison. Both offer a high refresh rate (likely 120Hz) for smooth visuals.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are missing. Generally, the Neo 7 is expected to have slightly improved image processing and potentially better low-light performance due to the newer chipset. However, without specific sensor details and sample images, a definitive comparison is difficult.
Performance
Here's where the Neo 7 shines. The Dimensity 8200 is a substantial upgrade over the Snapdragon 870. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better performance in demanding games. The Neo 7's 4nm process also contributes to improved efficiency. The Neo 6's Snapdragon 870 is still a capable chip, but it can't match the Neo 7's raw power.
Battery Life
The iQOO Neo 6 has an impressive endurance rating of 97 hours, indicating exceptional battery life. The Neo 7, while likely still offering good battery life, prioritizes charging speed over sheer capacity. The Neo 7's 120W charging is a game-changer, allowing for a 50% charge in just 10 minutes and a full charge in 25 minutes, compared to the Neo 6's 80W charging (12 min to 50%, 32 min to 100%).
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo iQOO Neo 7? Gamers and power users seeking the fastest charging speeds and a modern, high-performance chipset. Who should buy the vivo iQOO Neo 6? Budget-conscious buyers prioritizing exceptional battery life and a reliable, proven performance, and who don't need the absolute latest hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the iQOO Neo 7 worth the upgrade from the iQOO Neo 6?
If you prioritize performance and fast charging, then yes. The Neo 7's chipset and charging are significant upgrades. If battery life is your absolute top priority and you're on a tighter budget, the Neo 6 remains a solid choice.
❓ What is the difference in gaming performance between the two phones?
The iQOO Neo 7 offers noticeably better gaming performance thanks to its more powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset. You can expect higher frame rates and smoother gameplay, especially in graphically intensive titles.
