The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo iQOO Neo 7 and Motorola Edge 40 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features, but cater to slightly different priorities. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO Neo 7 takes the lead with its significantly faster charging and powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset. However, the Edge 40 boasts a brighter display and exceptional battery life. Ultimately, the iQOO Neo 7 is for performance enthusiasts, while the Edge 40 prioritizes longevity and visual experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - India | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 16 | 2023, May 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 16 | Available. Released 2023, May 04 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.34 in) | 158.4 x 72 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 167 g or 171 g (5.89 oz) |
| | - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| | Always-on display | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.4, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | Moto Ready For support |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 25 min | 68W wired
15W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4400 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Interstellar Black, Frost Blue | Nebula Green, Lunar Blue, Eclipse Black, Viva Magenta |
| Models | I2214 | XT2303-2 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | € 202.03 / $ 419.99 / £ 199.00 / ₹ 29,999 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 98h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.2 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 688347 (v9)
GeekBench: 3320 (v5.1), 3603 (v6)
GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo 7
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Excellent gaming performance
- Good value for money
- Display brightness not as high as Edge 40
- Battery life not as impressive as Edge 40
- Design might be less premium
Motorola Edge 40
- Exceptional battery life (98h endurance)
- Bright and vibrant display (1043 nits)
- Wireless charging support
- Sleek and modern design
- Slower charging speeds (68W wired)
- Less powerful chipset than iQOO Neo 7
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 shines with its impressive 1043 nits peak brightness, making it excellent for outdoor visibility. While the iQOO Neo 7 has a good display, it doesn't reach the same level of brightness. The Edge 40's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deep blacks and vibrant colors, though this is a marketing term. Both phones likely feature AMOLED panels with smooth refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but detailed comparisons require more in-depth testing. The Edge 40 likely excels in color accuracy and image processing, while the iQOO Neo 7 might offer slightly better low-light performance due to its chipset's image signal processor (ISP). Video recording capabilities are likely comparable.
Performance
The iQOO Neo 7's Dimensity 8200 chipset is noticeably more powerful than the Edge 40's Dimensity 8020. This translates to smoother gaming, faster app loading times, and better overall responsiveness. The Neo 7's 4nm process also contributes to improved efficiency. The Edge 40 is still capable, but the Neo 7 has a clear performance advantage.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40's endurance rating of 98 hours is exceptional, indicating outstanding battery life. The iQOO Neo 7, while having a decent battery, doesn't match this longevity. However, the iQOO Neo 7's 120W charging blows the Edge 40's 68W wired and 15W wireless charging out of the water, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Neo 7 is ideal for gamers and users who demand fast charging and top-tier performance. The Motorola Edge 40 is a great choice for those who value long battery life, a vibrant display, and a more refined overall experience, especially if wireless charging is a plus.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo iQOO Neo 7 is the better choice for gaming due to its more powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset.
❓ Does the Motorola Edge 40 support wireless charging?
Yes, the Motorola Edge 40 supports 15W wireless charging, a feature absent in the iQOO Neo 7.
❓ Which phone has the better camera?
It's difficult to definitively say without extensive testing. Both offer capable cameras, but the Edge 40 might have slightly better color accuracy.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone?
The iQOO Neo 7 charges from 0% to 100% in approximately 25 minutes with its 120W charger, while the Edge 40 takes significantly longer with its 68W charger.
