iQOO Neo 7 vs Google Pixel 7a: A Deep Dive into Performance and Photography
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and rapid charging, the iQOO Neo 7 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8200 chipset and 120W charging significantly outperform the Pixel 7a. However, the Pixel 7a’s superior camera processing and software support make it the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those deeply integrated into the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo 7 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - India | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 16 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 16 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.34 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| Always-on display | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 25 min | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Interstellar Black, Frost Blue | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | I2214 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
vivo iQOO Neo 7
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management for gaming
- Camera performance likely inferior to Pixel 7a
- Software updates may be less frequent than Pixel 7a
Google Pixel 7a
- Exceptional camera quality and image processing
- Clean Android experience with guaranteed updates
- Bright and vibrant display
- Significantly slower 18W charging
- Tensor G2 chipset may throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, providing excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the iQOO Neo 7’s display specifications aren’t provided, it’s likely to be slightly dimmer. The Pixel 7a’s OLED panel delivers vibrant colors and deep blacks, typical of the segment. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rates are likely fixed, impacting battery efficiency during prolonged use compared to adaptive refresh rate displays.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a key strength, leveraging Google’s computational photography prowess. While sensor sizes aren’t specified, the Pixel 7a’s image processing algorithms are renowned for their dynamic range and detail. The iQOO Neo 7’s camera capabilities are less emphasized in the provided data. The Pixel 7a’s video recording capabilities are also likely to be superior, benefiting from the Tensor G2’s dedicated image signal processor. The absence of details on the iQOO Neo 7’s camera suggests it may not compete directly with the Pixel 7a in image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Neo 7 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4nm), featuring a 3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core. The Pixel 7a is powered by Google’s Tensor G2 (5nm). While the Tensor G2’s Cortex-X1 cores clock slightly higher at 2.85 GHz, the Dimensity 8200’s more efficient 4nm process and optimized core configuration generally translate to superior sustained performance, particularly in graphically intensive tasks. The iQOO Neo 7 is likely to exhibit less thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 excels in AI-driven tasks, enhancing features like voice recognition and image processing.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating respectable battery life. However, the iQOO Neo 7’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving 50% charge in just 10 minutes and a full charge in 25 minutes. The Pixel 7a’s 18W charging, while supporting PD3.0, is significantly slower. This difference in charging speed dramatically impacts usability, allowing the iQOO Neo 7 to quickly top up during short breaks. While the Pixel 7a’s endurance rating suggests a larger battery capacity, the iQOO Neo 7’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo 7 if you need a phone for demanding mobile games, frequent fast charging, and aren't heavily invested in the Google ecosystem. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize camera quality, a clean Android experience with guaranteed updates, and seamless integration with Google services, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power and charging speed.