vivo iQOO Neo 6 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO Neo 6 edges out the Redmi Note 12 Pro thanks to its significantly faster charging and the Snapdragon 870 chipset, offering a smoother overall experience. However, the Redmi Note 12 Pro boasts a brighter display and potentially better camera optimization, making it a strong alternative for those prioritizing those features.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo 6 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 31 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 31 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 12 min, 100% in 32 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dark Nova, Cyber Rage | Frosted Blue (Sky Blue), Onyx Black (Midnight Black), Polar White, Stardust Purple |
| Models | I2126 | 22101316C, 22101316I, 23013RK75C, 22101316G |
| Price | About 360 EUR | € 148.54 / $ 142.17 / £ 149.99 / ₹ 19,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 97h | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.0 LUFS (Very good) | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 627246 (v8), 730223 (v9) GeekBench: 3076 (v5.1) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 490526 (v9) GeekBench: 2209 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo 6
- Faster Charging (80W)
- More Powerful Processor (Snapdragon 870)
- Excellent Gaming Performance
- Good Display Quality
- Camera Optimization potentially less refined than Redmi Note 12 Pro
- Design might be less premium
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro
- Brighter Display (890 nits)
- Potentially Better Camera Software
- Sleek Design
- Good Value for Money
- Slower Charging (67W)
- Less Powerful Processor (Dimensity 1080)
- Gaming performance not as strong as iQOO Neo 6
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro takes the lead in display brightness, measuring 890 nits compared to the iQOO Neo 6's 772 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), suggesting deep blacks and vibrant colors. While both are likely AMOLED panels, the Redmi Note 12 Pro's higher brightness will be noticeable in outdoor conditions. The iQOO Neo 6's display is still excellent, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro has a slight edge.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective and depends on individual preferences. Both phones likely feature versatile camera systems with multiple lenses. While specific camera specs are missing, the Redmi Note 12 Pro often benefits from Xiaomi's strong camera software optimization. The iQOO Neo 6's camera is expected to be good, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro might offer slightly better image processing and dynamic range. Further testing would be needed for a definitive verdict.
Performance
Here, the iQOO Neo 6 shines. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 chipset is a significant upgrade over the Redmi Note 12 Pro's Dimensity 1080. The Snapdragon 870 is known for its excellent gaming performance and overall responsiveness. While the Dimensity 1080 is a capable chip, it won't match the iQOO Neo 6's raw power. Expect smoother multitasking and faster app loading times on the iQOO Neo 6.
Battery Life
Both phones share the same endurance rating of 97h, suggesting comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the iQOO Neo 6's 80W charging is considerably faster than the Redmi Note 12 Pro's 67W charging. The iQOO Neo 6 can charge 50% in 12 minutes and 100% in 32 minutes, while the Redmi Note 12 Pro takes 15 and 46 minutes respectively. This faster charging speed gives the iQOO Neo 6 a significant advantage.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Neo 6 is ideal for gamers and power users who value speed and fast charging. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro is a great choice for users who prioritize a vibrant display, a potentially more refined camera experience, and a slightly more balanced feature set.