The vivo iQOO series is known for delivering impressive performance at competitive prices. Today, we're pitting two popular models against each other: the iQOO Neo 6 and the iQOO 7. Both offer compelling features, but which one comes out on top?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO 7 boasts a significantly faster charging speed and a more powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset. However, the iQOO Neo 6 offers excellent battery life and a bright display. Ultimately, the iQOO 7 is the performance king, while the Neo 6 provides better value for everyday use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 31 | 2021, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 31 | Available. Released 2021, January 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 163 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 162.2 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 209.5 g (7.41 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 (International), OriginOS 1.0 (China) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 12 min, 100% in 32 min | 120W wired, 100% in 15 min (China)
66W wired (International) |
| Type | 4700 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Nova, Cyber Rage | Gray, Blue, White, Legend |
| Models | I2126 | V2049A, I2009 |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 480 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 97h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-25.0 LUFS (Very good)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 627246 (v8), 730223 (v9)
GeekBench: 3076 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
vivo iQOO Neo 6
- Exceptional battery life
- Bright and vibrant display
- Smooth 120Hz refresh rate
- Excellent value for money
- Capable Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Slightly less powerful chipset than iQOO 7
- Camera details are limited
- Design may not appeal to everyone
vivo iQOO 7
- Significantly faster charging (120W/66W)
- More powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Smooth 120Hz refresh rate
- Premium design
- Shorter battery life compared to Neo 6
- Potentially higher price
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and gaming. The iQOO Neo 6 measures a peak brightness of 772 nits, which is impressive for outdoor visibility. The iQOO 7's display is also excellent, though brightness figures are not readily available. Both offer vibrant colors and deep blacks characteristic of AMOLED technology. The iQOO Neo 6's contrast ratio is listed as 'Infinite' which is a nominal value, suggesting excellent contrast.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited in the provided data. Both phones likely feature a triple-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide lens, and macro lens. The iQOO 7, with its more powerful processor, may offer slightly better image processing and video recording capabilities, but real-world differences are likely to be subtle. Both are expected to deliver decent image quality in good lighting conditions.
Performance
The iQOO 7 holds a clear advantage here. Its Snapdragon 888 chipset (5nm) is significantly more powerful than the iQOO Neo 6's Snapdragon 870 (7nm). While the 870 is still a capable chip, the 888 offers better raw performance for demanding games and multitasking. Expect smoother frame rates and faster load times on the iQOO 7.
Battery Life
The iQOO Neo 6 shines in this category. Its endurance rating of 97 hours is exceptional, suggesting outstanding battery life. The iQOO 7, while offering incredibly fast charging (120W in China, 66W internationally), likely has a smaller battery capacity, resulting in shorter overall battery life compared to the Neo 6.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO Neo 6 is ideal for users prioritizing long battery life, a vibrant display, and a smooth gaming experience without breaking the bank. The vivo iQOO 7 is the better choice for those who demand the absolute fastest performance and charging speeds, and are willing to pay a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the iQOO 7 worth the extra money over the iQOO Neo 6?
If you prioritize performance and charging speed above all else, the iQOO 7 is worth the investment. However, if battery life and value are more important, the iQOO Neo 6 is a fantastic choice.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The iQOO 7 is generally better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset, which delivers smoother frame rates and faster load times in demanding games.
