The vivo iQOO Neo 10R and Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra represent a fascinating intersection of performance and value in the mid-range smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver flagship-level experiences without the flagship price tag, but they achieve this through different approaches – Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 versus MediaTek’s Dimensity 9200+, and varying charging speeds. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right phone for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw charging speed and a slightly more powerful CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its 120W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Dimensity 9200+ offers a marginal performance edge. However, the iQOO Neo 10R remains a compelling option for those seeking a balanced package with efficient power management.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 11 | 2023, August 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 19 | Available. Released 2023, August 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.9 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Unspecified |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+, 10-bit |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 55W PD, 50% in 26 min, 100% in 55 min
7.5W reverse wired
Bypass charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6400 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Raging Blue, MoonKnight Titanium | Black, White, Green |
| Models | I2221 | 23078RKD5C |
| Price | ₹ 24,998 | About 330 EUR |
vivo iQOO Neo 10R
- Potentially better thermal management due to Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 architecture.
- 80W wired charging with 55W PD and reverse charging offers versatility.
- Efficient power delivery for longer gaming sessions.
- Slower charging speed compared to the Redmi K60 Ultra.
- CPU performance slightly behind the Dimensity 9200+.
Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging for minimal downtime.
- Dimensity 9200+ CPU offers a slight performance edge.
- PD3.0 support for wider charger compatibility.
- Potentially higher power consumption and thermal throttling under sustained load.
- Lacks reverse wired charging functionality.
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED displays (data not provided), the core battle lies within the silicon. The absence of display specs necessitates focusing on the processors. The iQOO Neo 10R’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, built on a 4nm process, is designed for efficiency, potentially leading to a more comfortable viewing experience in prolonged use. The Redmi K60 Ultra’s Dimensity 9200+ also utilizes a 4nm node, but its focus is on peak performance, which could translate to brighter, more vibrant visuals – assuming comparable panel quality.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a direct comparison is limited. However, both brands typically prioritize strong main sensors in this price bracket. The iQOO Neo 10R and Redmi K60 Ultra likely feature capable primary cameras, but the absence of information regarding sensor size, aperture, and optical image stabilization (OIS) makes it impossible to declare a clear winner. Image processing philosophies also differ between vivo and Xiaomi, with vivo often leaning towards vibrant, saturated colors and Xiaomi aiming for more natural tones.
Performance
The chipset showdown is central here. The Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra’s MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ boasts a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.35 GHz, exceeding the 3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 in the iQOO Neo 10R’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. This suggests a slight advantage in single-core performance for the Redmi. However, the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s architecture – with 4x Cortex-A720 cores and 3x Cortex-A520 cores – is optimized for sustained performance, potentially mitigating thermal throttling during demanding tasks. The Redmi’s 3x Cortex-A715 and 4x Cortex-A510 configuration is also strong, but the Snapdragon’s core arrangement may offer a more balanced workload distribution.
Battery Life
The Redmi K60 Ultra’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, promising a full charge in just 19 minutes. This is a significant advantage over the iQOO Neo 10R’s 80W charging, which takes 55 minutes for a complete cycle. While the iQOO Neo 10R offers 55W PD and reverse wired charging, the Redmi’s sheer speed is compelling. The battery capacity is not provided for either device, but the faster charging of the Redmi K60 Ultra effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery size.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo 10R if you need a phone with a focus on sustained performance and efficient power delivery, potentially benefiting from better thermal management during extended gaming sessions. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Ultra if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging speeds and a CPU that edges out the competition in benchmark tests, even if it means potentially slightly higher power consumption.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 9200+ in the Redmi K60 Ultra overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 9200+ is a powerful chip, sustained performance can lead to heat generation. Xiaomi typically employs thermal management solutions, but the iQOO Neo 10R’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, with its focus on efficiency, may exhibit less throttling during extended gaming. Real-world testing is crucial to determine the extent of any thermal limitations.
❓ Does the iQOO Neo 10R support bypass charging, and what are the benefits?
Yes, the iQOO Neo 10R supports bypass charging. This feature allows the phone to be powered directly from the charger when plugged in, bypassing the battery. This reduces heat generation during gaming and prolongs battery lifespan by minimizing charge cycles.
❓ Is 80W charging on the iQOO Neo 10R slow compared to the 120W on the Redmi K60 Ultra?
While 80W is slower than 120W, it's still a very respectable charging speed. The iQOO Neo 10R can reach 100% charge in 55 minutes, which is still relatively quick. The difference is most noticeable in the initial charging stages, where the Redmi K60 Ultra will gain a significant lead.
