The iQOO Neo 10R and Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range flagship space. The Neo 10R brings the newer Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 to the table, while the F5 Pro leverages the well-established Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. This comparison dissects their key differences, focusing on performance, charging, and overall user experience to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the iQOO Neo 10R emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 offers comparable, and in some cases superior, performance to the 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro, coupled with significantly faster 80W charging. While the Poco F5 Pro boasts a brighter display, the iQOO’s charging advantage and modern chipset give it the edge.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 11 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 19 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.9 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 55W PD, 50% in 26 min, 100% in 55 min
7.5W reverse wired
Bypass charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6400 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Raging Blue, MoonKnight Titanium | Black, White |
| Models | I2221 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | ₹ 24,998 | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo 10R
- Faster 80W wired charging
- Newer Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset
- Bypass charging for use while charging
- Display brightness data unavailable
- Camera specifications largely unknown
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Brighter display (1059 nits)
- Wireless charging support
- Proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 stability
- Older Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Slower overall charging speed compared to iQOO
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro’s display shines with a measured peak brightness of 1059 nits, making it more visible under direct sunlight than the iQOO Neo 10R (brightness data unavailable). Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED panels. However, the iQOO Neo 10R’s display specifications are missing, making a direct comparison of color accuracy and refresh rate impossible. The F5 Pro’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor users.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature capable camera systems, but detailed specifications are limited. The context data only indicates 'Photo / Video' capabilities for both. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a meaningful comparison is difficult. It’s reasonable to assume both phones will perform adequately in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will heavily depend on sensor size and image processing algorithms, which are currently unknown. We can safely assume that neither phone will prioritize a high-quality 2MP macro lens.
Performance
The iQOO Neo 10R’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) and its CPU configuration – 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4, 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720, and 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520 – represent a generational leap over the Poco F5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). While both are 4nm chips, the Cortex-X4 prime core in the 8s Gen 3 offers improved single-core performance. The F5 Pro’s CPU – 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510 – is still potent, but the iQOO Neo 10R is likely to exhibit better sustained performance due to the newer architecture and potentially improved thermal management. The iQOO Neo 10R benefits from a more modern CPU architecture, potentially leading to better efficiency and performance in demanding tasks.
Battery Life
Both the iQOO Neo 10R and Poco F5 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The iQOO Neo 10R supports 80W wired charging, reaching 50% in 26 minutes and 100% in 55 minutes, alongside 55W PD and 7.5W reverse wired charging. The Poco F5 Pro offers 67W wired charging (50% in 15 minutes) and 30W wireless charging (50% in 32 minutes). While the F5 Pro charges slightly faster initially, the iQOO Neo 10R’s 80W charging provides a more complete and faster charge overall. The addition of bypass charging on the iQOO Neo 10R is a bonus, allowing for charging while the device is in use.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo 10R if you prioritize charging speed and a modern chipset for sustained performance, especially if you frequently game or use demanding applications. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you value a brighter display for outdoor visibility and prefer a device with a proven track record of stability with the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, and wireless charging is a must-have.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in the iQOO Neo 10R throttle under sustained gaming loads?
While long-term testing is needed, the 8s Gen 3's 4nm process and improved architecture suggest better thermal efficiency than the 8+ Gen 1. This should translate to less throttling during extended gaming sessions, but performance will still be affected by the phone's cooling system, which is not detailed in the provided specifications.
❓ Is the 30W wireless charging on the Poco F5 Pro significantly slower than the 67W wired charging?
Yes, wireless charging is inherently slower than wired charging. While 30W wireless charging is respectable, it takes 32 minutes to reach 50%, whereas the 67W wired charging achieves the same in 15 minutes. For users prioritizing speed, wired charging is the preferred method.
❓ Does the iQOO Neo 10R support PD charging with other chargers?
Yes, the iQOO Neo 10R supports 55W PD (Power Delivery) charging, meaning it can be charged with compatible PD chargers, offering flexibility beyond the included charger.
❓ What kind of gaming performance can I expect from the Poco F5 Pro with the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro is still a very capable chipset for gaming. It can handle most modern titles at high settings, but may experience some throttling during prolonged, demanding sessions. Expect smooth performance in titles like PUBG, Call of Duty Mobile, and Genshin Impact.
