iQOO Neo 10 vs Poco F5 Pro: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power

The iQOO Neo 10 and Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Neo 10 arrives with the latest Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, promising a leap in performance, while the F5 Pro leverages the well-established Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, offering a balance of power and efficiency. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the iQOO Neo 10 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage, and the significantly faster 120W charging is a game-changer. While the Poco F5 Pro offers excellent battery endurance, the Neo 10’s speed and charging capabilities make it the better all-around choice.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo iQOO Neo 10 Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 481, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2025, May 262023, May 09
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, June 02Available. Released 2023, May
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic back, plastic frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame
Dimensions163.7 x 75.9 x 8.1 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in)162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight206 g (7.27 oz)204 g (7.20 oz)
 -IP53, dust and splash resistant
Display
ProtectionShield GlassCorning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density)1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density)
Size6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio)6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 4320Hz PWM, HDR, 2000 nits (HBM), 4400 nits (peak)AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4 nm)Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 825Adreno 730
OSAndroid 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15Android 13, upgradable to Android 15
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
 -UFS 3.1
Main Camera
Dual50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)-
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaDual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Triple-64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
Features-HDR
Single32 MP, f/2.5, (wide)16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS1080p@30/60fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -No
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 -24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE5.3, A2DP, LE
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging120W wired, 100W PD, 100W PPS, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 36 min Reverse wired Bypass Charging67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min
TypeSi/C Li-Ion 7000 mAhLi-Po 5160 mAh
Misc
ColorsInferno Red, Titanium Chrome, Blaze Orange, Onyx BlackBlack, White
Models-23013PC75G
Price₹ 31,998$ 449.99 / € 241.85
SAR-1.09 W/kg (head)     1.08 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-1.00 W/kg (head)     1.00 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life-Endurance rating 99h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -26.2 LUFS (Good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo iQOO Neo 10

  • Significantly faster 120W charging
  • Newer Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset for superior performance
  • Reverse wired charging and bypass charging for added convenience

  • Display specifications currently unknown
  • Camera details are limited

Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro

  • Excellent 99-hour battery endurance
  • Bright 1059 nit display for outdoor visibility
  • Proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset

  • Slower 67W wired charging
  • Older chipset architecture compared to the iQOO Neo 10

Display Comparison

The Poco F5 Pro boasts a bright display, reaching a measured 1059 nits. While the iQOO Neo 10’s display specs are currently unavailable, the F5 Pro’s infinite (nominal) contrast ratio suggests a strong visual experience. The F5 Pro’s brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor visibility. Without knowing the Neo 10’s panel technology (LTPO, refresh rate), it’s difficult to assess its efficiency, but the F5 Pro’s established display quality is a strong point.

Camera Comparison

Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. The absence of specific details suggests both phones likely target a similar mid-range camera experience. We can assume the Poco F5 Pro, given Xiaomi’s history, will likely emphasize computational photography, while iQOO may focus on color accuracy. The lack of information on OIS is a significant omission for both.

Performance

The iQOO Neo 10’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4nm) represents a significant architectural upgrade over the Poco F5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The 8s Gen 4 features a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.21 GHz, compared to the 8+ Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 at 3.0 GHz. This, combined with the newer Cortex-A720 cores in the Neo 10, translates to improved single-core and multi-core performance. While both chips are built on a 4nm process, the newer architecture of the 8s Gen 4 should offer better power efficiency and sustained performance under load. The Neo 10’s CPU configuration (1+3+2+2) also suggests a more balanced approach to performance and efficiency than the F5 Pro’s (1+3+4).

Battery Life

The Poco F5 Pro claims an impressive 99-hour endurance rating, indicating excellent battery life. However, the iQOO Neo 10 counters with significantly faster charging: 120W wired, capable of reaching 50% in 15 minutes and 100% in 36 minutes. The F5 Pro’s 67W wired charging (50% in 15 minutes) and 30W wireless charging are respectable, but fall short of the Neo 10’s speed. The Neo 10 also includes reverse wired charging and bypass charging, adding to its versatility. While the F5 Pro may last longer on a single charge, the Neo 10’s rapid charging minimizes downtime.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo iQOO Neo 10 if you prioritize raw performance, especially for gaming, and value incredibly fast charging. You'll benefit from a more future-proof chipset and quicker power-ups. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you prioritize long battery life and a proven, reliable chipset, and are less concerned with having the absolute latest technology. It's a solid choice for everyday use and media consumption.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 in the iQOO Neo 10 get noticeably hotter than the 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro during extended gaming sessions?
While the 8s Gen 4 is more powerful, the 4nm process and architectural improvements should result in comparable or even better thermal efficiency than the 8+ Gen 1. However, sustained performance will depend on the iQOO Neo 10’s cooling system, which is currently unknown. Expect both phones to experience some throttling under heavy load, but the Neo 10’s newer architecture may mitigate this.
❓ Does the 120W charging on the iQOO Neo 10 degrade the battery health faster than the 67W charging on the Poco F5 Pro?
Faster charging *can* contribute to slightly faster battery degradation over the long term, but modern smartphones employ sophisticated charging management systems to minimize this effect. The iQOO Neo 10’s charging circuitry likely includes safeguards to protect battery health. The convenience of significantly faster charging may outweigh the potential for minor long-term degradation.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on the iQOO Neo 10 a cause for concern?
It's a valid concern. The absence of sensor size, aperture, and OIS information makes it difficult to assess the Neo 10’s camera capabilities. However, iQOO typically focuses on delivering a balanced camera experience, and the phone is likely to perform adequately in most lighting conditions. We'll need to wait for independent reviews to get a clearer picture.