iQOO Neo 10 vs Oppo Find X6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance, Camera, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and incredibly fast charging, the iQOO Neo 10 emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 offers excellent gaming capabilities, and the 120W charging is significantly faster than the Oppo's 100W. However, the Find X6 Pro’s superior display and potentially more refined camera system make it a compelling choice for multimedia enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo 10 | Oppo Find X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 26 | 2023, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 02 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.9 x 8.1 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 164.8 x 76.2 x 9.1 mm or 9.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 216 g or 218 g (7.62 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 4320Hz PWM, HDR, 2000 nits (HBM), 4400 nits (peak) | LTPO3 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1500 nits (HBM), 2500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 825 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100W PD, 100W PPS, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 36 min Reverse wired Bypass Charging | 100W wired, PD, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 30 min 50W wireless, 50% in 22 min, 100% in 51 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Inferno Red, Titanium Chrome, Blaze Orange, Onyx Black | Black, Green, Brown |
| Models | - | PGEM110, PGEM10 |
| Price | ₹ 31,998 | About 820 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1294797 (v9) GeekBench: 4791 (v5.1), 5226 (v6) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo 10
- Significantly faster 120W wired charging
- Newer Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset
- Supports 100W PD/PPS for wider charger compatibility
- Camera specifications are unknown
- Display brightness and technology details are missing
Oppo Find X6 Pro
- Brighter display with potentially LTPO technology
- Established Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Wireless charging and reverse wireless charging support
- Slower 100W wired charging
- Older chipset compared to the iQOO Neo 10
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1318 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the iQOO Neo 10. While the Neo 10’s display specs are missing, the Find X6 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a high-quality OLED panel. This brightness advantage benefits outdoor visibility. The Find X6 Pro’s panel technology is likely LTPO, enabling variable refresh rates for improved power efficiency, a feature not confirmed on the iQOO Neo 10. Users who consume a lot of HDR content or spend significant time outdoors will greatly benefit from the Find X6 Pro’s display.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed specifications are limited for the iQOO Neo 10. The Oppo Find X6 Pro’s camera is described as ‘Photo / Video’ without specifics, but Oppo’s flagship history suggests a focus on image quality and versatility. Sensor size and aperture details are missing for both, making a direct comparison difficult. The Find X6 Pro likely benefits from Oppo’s advanced image processing algorithms. The absence of details regarding the iQOO Neo 10’s camera system suggests it may not be a primary selling point, potentially focusing on computational photography to enhance image quality.
Performance
The iQOO Neo 10’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4nm) is a newer architecture than the Oppo Find X6 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm). While the 8 Gen 2 historically held the performance crown, the 8s Gen 4 closes the gap, offering comparable CPU performance with its Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.21 GHz. The CPU core configuration differs; the Neo 10 utilizes a mix of Cortex-A720 cores, while the Find X6 Pro employs A715 and A710 cores. The 8 Gen 2’s Adreno 740 GPU is a known performer, but the 8s Gen 4’s Adreno 735 is also highly capable. The iQOO Neo 10’s thermal management will be crucial to sustaining peak performance, as the 8s Gen 4’s efficiency needs to be assessed in real-world scenarios. Both devices utilize LPDDR5x RAM, ensuring fast memory access.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X6 Pro has an endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating solid battery life. The iQOO Neo 10’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 120W wired charging is a significant advantage, achieving 50% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 36 minutes. The Find X6 Pro’s 100W charging takes 30 minutes for a full charge. Furthermore, the iQOO Neo 10 supports 100W PD and PPS, offering wider compatibility, and includes 100W reverse wired charging. The Find X6 Pro also offers 50W wireless charging (51 minutes to full) and 10W reverse wireless charging, providing more charging flexibility. The iQOO Neo 10’s faster charging speeds are ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo 10 if you need a powerful gaming experience, lightning-fast charging, and don't mind potentially sacrificing some camera refinement. Buy the Oppo Find X6 Pro if you prioritize a brighter, higher-quality display, a potentially more versatile camera system, and wireless charging convenience, even if it means slightly slower wired charging and a less recent chipset.