iQOO Neo 10 vs Motorola Edge 40 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw speed and incredibly fast charging, the iQOO Neo 10 emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, coupled with 120W charging (fully charging in just 36 minutes), offers a compelling package. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro remains a strong contender for those valuing a proven platform and wireless charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO Neo 10 | Motorola Edge 40 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 26 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 02 | Available. Released 2023, April 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.9 x 8.1 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 4320Hz PWM, HDR, 2000 nits (HBM), 4400 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 825 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Ready For 3.5 support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100W PD, 100W PPS, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 36 min Reverse wired Bypass Charging | 125W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 23 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wired 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Inferno Red, Titanium Chrome, Blaze Orange, Onyx Black | Interstellar Black, Lunar Blue |
| Price | ₹ 31,998 | € 313.87 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -22.6 LUFS (Excellent) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1273764 (v9) GeekBench: 4896 (v5.1), 5352 (v6) GFXBench: 112fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO Neo 10
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Latest Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset
- Bypass Charging for cooler gaming
- No wireless charging
- Camera specs are unknown
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
- Proven Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- High peak display brightness
- Slower wired charging compared to iQOO Neo 10
- May be more expensive
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro boasts a display capable of reaching 1050 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the iQOO Neo 10’s display specs are not provided, it’s likely to be slightly dimmer. Both devices feature an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels. The Edge 40 Pro’s brightness advantage will be noticeable for outdoor users and those consuming HDR content.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Given Motorola’s history, the Edge 40 Pro likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and advanced image processing algorithms. Without specific sensor sizes or aperture information for the iQOO Neo 10, it’s difficult to assess its photographic capabilities. The Edge 40 Pro’s established camera reputation gives it an edge in this category.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm), featuring a 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 prime core. The iQOO Neo 10, however, employs the newer SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4nm). While the 8 Gen 2 is a proven performer, the 8s Gen 4’s architecture – with its 1x3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 and revised A720 cores – aims to deliver improved efficiency and performance. The iQOO Neo 10’s CPU configuration suggests a focus on sustained performance, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. Both devices benefit from the 4nm process node, contributing to thermal efficiency.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 117 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the iQOO Neo 10). However, the charging speeds are dramatically different. The iQOO Neo 10’s 120W wired charging can reach 50% in 15 minutes and 100% in 36 minutes, while the Edge 40 Pro’s 125W charging achieves 50% in 6 minutes and 100% in 23 minutes. The Edge 40 Pro also offers 15W wireless and 5W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the iQOO Neo 10. The iQOO Neo 10’s bypass charging feature is a bonus for users who want to minimize heat generation while gaming.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO Neo 10 if you need the absolute fastest charging speeds and are eager to experience the latest Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset for demanding gaming and multitasking. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Pro if you prefer a more established platform with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, prioritize wireless charging capabilities, and value a potentially more refined software experience.