The vivo iQOO series is known for delivering high-performance smartphones at competitive prices. The iQOO 9T and iQOO Neo 7 are two of their latest contenders, both boasting impressive specs. But which one offers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO 9T takes the crown for raw power thanks to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, offering a noticeable performance edge. However, the iQOO Neo 7 provides excellent value with its Dimensity 8200 and slightly faster charging, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious gamers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - India |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 02 | 2023, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 02 | Available. Released 2023, February 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165 x 77 x 8 mm (6.50 x 3.03 x 0.31 in) | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.6 mm (6.49 x 3.03 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | Dust and dripping water resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom
13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), AF | 64 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min, 100% in 19 min | 120W wired, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 25 min |
| Type | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Alpha, Legend (BMW M branding) | Interstellar Black, Frost Blue |
| Models | - | I2214 |
| Price | About 600 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 117h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.8 LUFS (Average)
| - |
vivo iQOO 9T
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Higher Peak Brightness Display
- Potentially Better Camera Processing
- Excellent Battery Life (117h Endurance)
- Slightly Slower Charging (19 mins)
- Potentially Higher Price
vivo iQOO Neo 7
- Faster Charging (25 mins)
- Excellent Value for Money
- Capable Performance (Dimensity 8200)
- Lower Peak Brightness Display
- Slightly Less Powerful Chipset
- Potentially Less Refined Camera
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth visuals. The iQOO 9T boasts a significantly higher peak brightness of 1033 nits compared to the Neo 7, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. While the Neo 7's contrast ratio is likely excellent (typical of AMOLED), the 9T's 'infinite' rating suggests potentially even deeper blacks. Overall, the 9T has a slight edge in display quality.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited in the provided data. However, based on general knowledge, both phones likely feature capable camera systems. The iQOO 9T is expected to have a more refined camera processing pipeline due to its higher-tier chipset. Both likely offer good video recording capabilities, but the 9T might have slightly better stabilization and dynamic range. Further testing would be needed for a definitive comparison.
Performance
The iQOO 9T's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset is the clear winner here. It's a flagship-level processor that consistently outperforms the Dimensity 8200 in demanding tasks and gaming. While the Neo 7's Dimensity 8200 is still a capable chip, the 9T offers a smoother and more responsive experience, especially with graphically intensive games. Expect better thermal management on the 9T as well.
Battery Life
Both phones offer 120W fast charging, a significant advantage. The iQOO 9T charges slightly slower (19 minutes to 100%) compared to the Neo 7 (25 minutes). However, the iQOO 9T's endurance rating of 117h suggests superior battery life overall, likely due to more efficient power management and potentially a slightly larger battery capacity (though this isn't explicitly stated).
Buying Guide
The iQOO 9T is ideal for hardcore gamers and power users who demand the absolute best performance. The iQOO Neo 7 is a fantastic choice for gamers and everyday users seeking a balance of performance, features, and affordability.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the iQOO 9T worth the extra money over the iQOO Neo 7?
If you prioritize top-tier performance and a brighter display, the iQOO 9T is worth the investment. However, if you're on a tighter budget and still want a great gaming experience, the iQOO Neo 7 offers excellent value.
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The iQOO 9T, with its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, delivers significantly better gaming performance compared to the iQOO Neo 7's Dimensity 8200.
