vivo iQOO 9T vs iQOO 9 SE: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO 9T takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and blazing-fast 120W charging. While the 9 SE offers a more budget-friendly option, the 9T's performance and charging speed provide a noticeable edge for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 9T | vivo iQOO 9 SE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 02 | 2022, February 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 02 | Available. Released 2022, March 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 165 x 77 x 8 mm (6.50 x 3.03 x 0.31 in) | 163.2 x 76.4 x 8.4 mm (6.43 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Dust and dripping water resistant | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min, 100% in 19 min | 66W wired, 50% in 14 min, 100% in 39 min |
| Type | 4700 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Alpha, Legend (BMW M branding) | Space Fusion, Sunset Sierra |
| Price | About 600 EUR | About 400 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 117h | Endurance rating 87h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.8 LUFS (Average) | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 727771 (v8), 846231 (v9) GeekBench: 3442 (v5.1) GFXBench: 64fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 9T
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Brighter display
- Slightly better battery endurance
- Potentially higher price
- Camera specs not fully detailed
vivo iQOO 9 SE
- More affordable price
- Good all-around performance
- Decent battery life
- 66W fast charging
- Slower Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Less bright display
- Slower charging speed
Display Comparison
The iQOO 9T boasts a significantly brighter display at 1033 nits compared to the iQOO 9 SE's 863 nits. Both feature an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (likely a marketing term indicating very high contrast), but the increased brightness of the 9T makes it more visible in direct sunlight and offers a more vibrant viewing experience. Both likely use AMOLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates, providing smooth scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are marketed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, detailed camera specifications are missing. Based on general knowledge, the iQOO 9T likely has a slightly better camera system due to the more powerful processor assisting with image processing. Both likely feature a main sensor around 50MP, an ultrawide lens, and a macro lens. Image quality will likely be comparable in good lighting conditions, but the 9T may offer better low-light performance.
Performance
This is where the iQOO 9T truly shines. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset is a substantial upgrade over the iQOO 9 SE's Snapdragon 888. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and significantly improved gaming performance on the 9T. The 9 SE is still capable, but the 9T's processor provides a clear advantage.
Battery Life
The iQOO 9T holds a slight edge in endurance rating (117h vs 87h), suggesting slightly better overall battery life despite its more power-hungry processor. However, the real difference lies in charging speed. The iQOO 9T's 120W charging is incredibly fast, reaching 50% in just 8 minutes and 100% in 19 minutes, while the iQOO 9 SE's 66W charging takes 14 minutes to reach 50% and 39 minutes for a full charge.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO 9T is ideal for gamers, content creators, and anyone who demands top-tier performance and rapid charging. The iQOO 9 SE is a great choice for users seeking a solid all-around smartphone with good performance and a more accessible price point, prioritizing battery life over raw speed.