vivo iQOO 9T vs iQOO 9 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO 9T edges out the 9 Pro thanks to its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chip, resulting in noticeably faster performance. While the 9 Pro offers wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, the 9T's superior processing power makes it the better choice for serious gamers and power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 9T | vivo iQOO 9 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 02 | 2022, January 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 02 | Available. Released 2022, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Panda Glass), aluminum frame, glass back or aramid fiber back |
| Dimensions | 165 x 77 x 8 mm (6.50 x 3.03 x 0.31 in) | 164.8 x 75.2 x 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 204 g or 210 g (7.20 oz) |
| Dust and dripping water resistant | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 (International), OriginOS Ocean (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 (V6) | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED lash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 60mm (telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.3, 15mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min, 100% in 19 min | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min, 100% in 20 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4700 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Alpha, Legend (BMW M branding) | Legend (White w/ BMW M branding), Dark Cruise, Orange |
| Models | - | V2172A, I2022 |
| Price | About 600 EUR | About 630 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 117h | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.8 LUFS (Average) | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 862324 (v8), 997948 (v9) GeekBench: 3708 (v5.1) GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 9T
- Superior Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Faster charging speeds
- Higher peak brightness display
- Excellent endurance rating
- Lacks wireless charging
- Design may be less premium than 9 Pro
vivo iQOO 9 Pro
- Wireless charging support (50W)
- Reverse wireless charging
- Potentially slightly better color accuracy
- Premium design
- Slightly slower Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 performance
- Lower endurance rating
- Slightly lower peak brightness
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate. The iQOO 9T boasts a slightly higher peak brightness of 1033 nits compared to the 9 Pro's 1000 nits, offering marginally better visibility in direct sunlight. Both have excellent contrast ratios (Infinite nominal). The iQOO 9 Pro may have slightly better color accuracy, but both are very good.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable between the two. Both offer capable photo and video capabilities, though neither is a class-leading camera phone. Expect good detail and dynamic range in well-lit conditions. Low-light performance is decent but not exceptional. Specific camera hardware details are missing, but both likely feature a main 50MP sensor.
Performance
This is where the iQOO 9T truly shines. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset is significantly faster and more efficient than the 9 Pro's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. Expect smoother gameplay, quicker app loading times, and better multitasking on the 9T. The 9T's chip also handles heat better under sustained load.
Battery Life
The iQOO 9T holds a slight advantage in battery endurance, with an endurance rating of 117h compared to the 9 Pro's 97h. However, both offer incredibly fast 120W wired charging, getting you from 0 to 100% in around 20 minutes. The 9 Pro adds 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, which the 9T lacks.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO 9T is ideal for gamers and those prioritizing raw performance and blazing-fast charging. The iQOO 9 Pro is a better fit for users who value wireless charging convenience and a slightly more premium feel, though they'll sacrifice some processing power.