vivo iQOO 9 vs Xiaomi 11T Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO 9 edges out the Xiaomi 11T Pro thanks to its slightly faster charging, marginally better CPU performance, and superior endurance rating. Both offer excellent value, but the iQOO 9 provides a more complete package for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 9 | Xiaomi 11T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 23 | 2021, September 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 02 | Available. Released 2021, October 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Panda Glass), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 75.1 x 8.6 or 8.7 mm | 164.1 x 76.9 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g / 202 g (7.05 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Splash and dust resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, Dolby Vision, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Monster Touch support | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | Tuned by Harman Kardon 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 18 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 72% in 10 min, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | 4350 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Legend, Alpha, Phoenix Orange | Meteorite Gray, Moonlight White, Celestial Blue |
| Models | - | 2107113SG, 2107113SI, 2107113SR |
| Price | About 510 EUR | € 139.00 / $ 185.21 / £ 189.99 / ₹ 39,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.78 W/kg (head) 0.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 105h | Endurance rating 92h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.5 LUFS (Very good) | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 745168 (v8), 852898 (v9) GeekBench: 3503 (v5.1) GFXBench: 65fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
vivo iQOO 9
- Faster Charging
- Better Battery Life
- Slightly Faster CPU
- Aggressive Gaming Features
- Camera might not be as versatile as Xiaomi
- Design might be less appealing to some
Xiaomi 11T Pro
- Slightly Brighter Display
- Versatile Camera System
- Potentially Lower Price
- Good Overall Value
- Slightly Slower Charging
- Lower Battery Endurance
- Performance slightly behind iQOO 9
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays with vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Xiaomi 11T Pro boasts a slightly higher peak brightness of 837 nits compared to the iQOO 9's 749 nits, offering a marginally better outdoor visibility. However, both have infinite contrast ratios, ensuring stunning visuals. The iQOO 9 might have a slightly better color calibration, but this is subjective.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a complex area. While both phones offer capable camera systems, the Xiaomi 11T Pro is generally considered to have a more versatile camera setup, particularly in low-light conditions. The iQOO 9's camera is still excellent, but the Xiaomi 11T Pro's image processing might be preferred by some. Video recording capabilities are comparable on both devices.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Snapdragon 888+ 5G chipset, but the iQOO 9 has a slightly faster prime core (2.99 GHz vs 2.84 GHz) on its Cortex-X1. This translates to a small but noticeable performance advantage in demanding tasks and games. Both phones offer smooth multitasking and responsive performance overall.
Battery Life
The iQOO 9 takes a clear lead in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 105 hours compared to the Xiaomi 11T Pro's 92 hours. Both phones support 120W wired charging, but the iQOO 9 charges slightly faster (18 minutes vs 17 minutes for 100%).
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO 9 is ideal for gamers and power users who prioritize raw performance and blazing-fast charging. The Xiaomi 11T Pro is a great choice for those seeking a well-rounded flagship experience with a strong camera and vibrant display, at a potentially slightly lower price point.