vivo iQOO 9 vs vivo V27: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V27 emerges as the overall winner thanks to its significantly better battery life and brighter display. While the iQOO 9 boasts a more powerful chipset, the V27's improved longevity and vibrant screen make it a more practical choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 9 | vivo V27 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 78 SA/NSA - Asia | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 23 | 2023, March 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 02 | Available. Released 2023, March 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Panda Glass), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 75.1 x 8.6 or 8.7 mm | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g / 202 g (7.05 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Splash and dust resistant | Color changing back panel color | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Monster Touch support | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 18 min | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | 4350 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Legend, Alpha, Phoenix Orange | Magic Blue, Noble Black, Emerald Green, Flowing Gold |
| Models | - | V2231, V2246 |
| Price | About 510 EUR | About 380 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 105h | Endurance rating 134h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.5 LUFS (Very good) | -28.2 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 745168 (v8), 852898 (v9) GeekBench: 3503 (v5.1) GFXBench: 65fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 613641 (v9) GeekBench: 2400 (v5.1), 2689 (v6) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 9
- Faster Processor
- 120W Fast Charging
- Potentially Better Video Recording
- Shorter Battery Life
- Less Bright Display
- Potentially Higher Price
vivo V27
- Excellent Battery Life
- Brighter Display
- Stylish Design
- Good Value
- Less Powerful Processor
- Slower Charging (66W)
- Camera Performance Needs Further Evaluation
Display Comparison
The vivo V27 takes a clear lead in the display department. Its measured peak brightness of 1055 nits significantly surpasses the iQOO 9's 749 nits, resulting in a much more visible screen outdoors and in bright environments. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (Infinite, nominally), but the V27's brightness advantage is undeniable. The iQOO 9's display is still good, but not as impressive.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective and requires more in-depth testing. Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the iQOO 9 likely has a slight edge in video recording due to the Snapdragon 888+'s superior image signal processor. The V27 may offer more refined color science and potentially better low-light performance depending on the specific sensor configurations. Detailed camera samples would be needed for a definitive conclusion.
Performance
The iQOO 9 holds the advantage in performance. Its Snapdragon 888+ chipset is considerably more powerful than the Dimensity 7200 in the V27. This translates to smoother gaming, faster app loading times, and better overall responsiveness, especially in demanding tasks. However, the Dimensity 7200 is still a capable processor for everyday use.
Battery Life
The vivo V27 dominates in battery life. Its endurance rating of 134h is significantly higher than the iQOO 9's 105h. This means the V27 will comfortably last a full day and potentially longer, while the iQOO 9 may require a midday top-up for heavy users. The V27's 66W charging is still fast, though not as blazing fast as the iQOO 9's 120W.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO 9 is ideal for gamers and power users who prioritize raw performance and fast charging. The vivo V27 is a better fit for everyday users who value long battery life, a stunning display, and a stylish design.