vivo iQOO 9 vs iQOO 9 SE: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO 9 takes the crown with its significantly faster 120W charging, brighter display, and slightly more powerful processor. However, the iQOO 9 SE remains a strong contender, offering a more budget-friendly option with a still-capable Snapdragon 888 and respectable battery life.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 9 | vivo iQOO 9 SE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 23 | 2022, February 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 02 | Available. Released 2022, March 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Panda Glass), aluminum frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 75.1 x 8.6 or 8.7 mm | 163.2 x 76.4 x 8.4 mm (6.43 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g / 202 g (7.05 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Splash and dust resistant | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Monster Touch support | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 18 min | 66W wired, 50% in 14 min, 100% in 39 min |
| Type | 4350 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Legend, Alpha, Phoenix Orange | Space Fusion, Sunset Sierra |
| Price | About 510 EUR | About 400 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 105h | Endurance rating 87h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.5 LUFS (Very good) | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 745168 (v8), 852898 (v9) GeekBench: 3503 (v5.1) GFXBench: 65fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 727771 (v8), 846231 (v9) GeekBench: 3442 (v5.1) GFXBench: 64fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 9
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Brighter display
- Slightly more powerful processor
- Excellent performance for gaming
- Potentially higher price
- Camera details are unclear
vivo iQOO 9 SE
- More affordable
- Still-capable Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Respectable battery life
- Good value for money
- Slower 66W charging
- Slightly dimmer display
- Marginally less powerful CPU
Display Comparison
The iQOO 9 boasts a peak brightness of 749 nits, noticeably brighter than the iQOO 9 SE's 863 nits. While both offer excellent contrast ratios (nominally infinite), the iQOO 9's higher brightness will provide better visibility in direct sunlight. Both likely feature AMOLED panels with smooth refresh rates (likely 120Hz, though not explicitly stated).
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse, simply labeled 'Photo / Video' for both devices. Based on typical iQOO configurations, expect a primary sensor (likely 50MP), ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. Image quality will likely be comparable, with the iQOO 9 potentially having slightly better processing due to its more powerful chipset. Video recording capabilities are likely similar, supporting 4K resolution.
Performance
Both phones are powered by Snapdragon 888 5G chipsets, but the iQOO 9 has a slightly more powerful CPU configuration (Cortex-X1 clocked at 2.99 GHz vs 2.84 GHz on the SE). This translates to a marginal performance advantage in demanding tasks and games, though both should handle everyday use with ease. RAM and storage configurations likely vary, impacting multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
The iQOO 9 holds a significant advantage in charging speed, with 120W wired charging compared to the iQOO 9 SE's 66W. This allows the iQOO 9 to charge from 50% to 100% in just 18 minutes, while the SE takes 39 minutes. While both have similar endurance ratings (105h vs 87h), the iQOO 9's faster charging makes it more convenient for topping up.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO 9 is ideal for power users, gamers, and anyone who prioritizes blazing-fast charging and a vibrant display. The iQOO 9 SE is a great choice for budget-conscious buyers who still want a smooth experience and a reliable smartphone without breaking the bank.