vivo iQOO 9 vs iQOO 9 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO 9 Pro offers a brighter display, a newer and more efficient chipset, and the added convenience of wireless charging. However, the iQOO 9 boasts slightly better battery endurance and marginally faster wired charging. Ultimately, the Pro is the superior device, justifying its higher price for those seeking the best overall experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 9 | vivo iQOO 9 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 23 | 2022, January 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 02 | Available. Released 2022, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Panda Glass), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Panda Glass), aluminum frame, glass back or aramid fiber back |
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 75.1 x 8.6 or 8.7 mm | 164.8 x 75.2 x 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g / 202 g (7.05 oz) | 204 g or 210 g (7.20 oz) |
| Splash and dust resistant | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Monster Touch support | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 (International), OriginOS Ocean (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 (V6) | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED lash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 60mm (telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.3, 15mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 18 min | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min, 100% in 20 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4350 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Legend, Alpha, Phoenix Orange | Legend (White w/ BMW M branding), Dark Cruise, Orange |
| Models | - | V2172A, I2022 |
| Price | About 510 EUR | About 630 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 105h | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.5 LUFS (Very good) | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 745168 (v8), 852898 (v9) GeekBench: 3503 (v5.1) GFXBench: 65fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 862324 (v8), 997948 (v9) GeekBench: 3708 (v5.1) GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 9
- Excellent Battery Life
- Faster Wired Charging (slightly)
- Competitive Price
- Smooth 120Hz Display
- Lower Peak Brightness
- Older Chipset
- No Wireless Charging
vivo iQOO 9 Pro
- Brighter Display
- Newer & More Efficient Chipset
- Wireless Charging Support
- Reverse Wireless Charging
- Slightly Shorter Battery Life
- Slightly Slower Wired Charging
- Higher Price
Display Comparison
The iQOO 9 Pro takes a clear lead in the display department. While both phones feature excellent OLED panels with infinite contrast ratios, the Pro's 1000 nits peak brightness significantly surpasses the iQOO 9's 749 nits. This difference is noticeable in outdoor visibility and HDR content playback. Both offer smooth 120Hz refresh rates for fluid scrolling and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera specifications are missing. Generally, the Pro models in vivo's lineup tend to have slightly improved camera hardware and image processing algorithms. Expect the iQOO 9 Pro to potentially offer better low-light performance and more refined image quality. Video recording capabilities are likely comparable.
Performance
The iQOO 9 Pro's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset is a generation newer than the iQOO 9's Snapdragon 888+. The 8 Gen 1 offers improved CPU and GPU performance, along with better power efficiency. While both phones handle demanding games with ease, the Pro provides a smoother and more consistent experience, especially during extended gaming sessions. The Pro's 4nm process also contributes to reduced heat generation.
Battery Life
The iQOO 9 edges out the iQOO 9 Pro in terms of raw battery endurance, with an endurance rating of 105 hours compared to 97 hours. However, the iQOO 9 Pro's 120W wired charging is incredibly fast, and the addition of 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging provides added convenience.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO 9 is ideal for gamers and power users on a budget who prioritize battery life and fast-wired charging. The iQOO 9 Pro is the better choice for those who demand the absolute best performance, a brighter display, and the flexibility of wireless charging, even if it means a slightly shorter battery life.