vivo iQOO 9 vs Motorola Edge 30 Fusion: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO 9 edges out the Edge 30 Fusion thanks to its significantly faster charging and slightly brighter display. Both offer excellent performance thanks to the Snapdragon 888+, but the iQOO 9's charging speed provides a noticeable advantage in daily use. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your priorities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 9 | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - PRC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 23 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 02 | Available. Released 2022, September 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Panda Glass), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 75.1 x 8.6 or 8.7 mm | 158.5 x 72 x 7.5 mm or 7.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g / 202 g (7.05 oz) | 168 g / 175 g (5.93 oz) |
| Splash and dust resistant | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1100 nits (peak) |
| Monster Touch support | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Ready For 3.5 support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 18 min | 68W wired, 50% in 10 min |
| Type | 4350 mAh | Li-Po 4400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Legend, Alpha, Phoenix Orange | Neptune Blue, Cosmic Grey, Solar Gold, Aurora White, Viva Magenta |
| Models | - | XT2243-1 |
| Price | About 510 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 105h | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.5 LUFS (Very good) | -24.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 745168 (v8), 852898 (v9) GeekBench: 3503 (v5.1) GFXBench: 65fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 827929 (v9) GeekBench: 3458 (v5.1) GFXBench: 62fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 9
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Brighter display
- Potentially better camera versatility
- Strong performance with Snapdragon 888+
- Design might be less appealing to some
- Software experience can be more aggressive
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
- Clean and near-stock Android experience
- Slightly brighter display
- Stylish design
- Good overall performance
- Slower charging speed
- Camera might not be as versatile as iQOO 9
- Potentially less optimized software
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent OLED displays, but the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion boasts a higher peak brightness of 946 nits compared to the iQOO 9's 749 nits. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. Both have a nominal infinite contrast ratio, providing deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Edge 30 Fusion's slightly higher refresh rate (typically 144Hz) might offer a smoother scrolling experience, though the iQOO 9's refresh rate is also very competitive.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a key area where differences emerge. While both offer capable camera systems, the iQOO 9 is generally considered to have a slightly more versatile setup, often with better low-light performance and video stabilization. The Edge 30 Fusion's camera is still very good, but the iQOO 9 often produces more detailed and vibrant images. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would need to be researched further for a more precise comparison.
Performance
Under the hood, both devices are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ 5G chipset, ensuring smooth performance for demanding tasks and gaming. While both have the same CPU configuration, real-world performance can vary slightly based on software optimization. Both phones handle multitasking and resource-intensive apps with ease.
Battery Life
Both phones offer respectable battery life, achieving similar endurance ratings (105h vs 101h). However, the iQOO 9's 120W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast charging speeds (50% in 6 minutes, 100% in 18 minutes). The Edge 30 Fusion's 68W charging is still fast, but significantly slower (50% in 10 minutes, 100% not specified).
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO 9 is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging and a vibrant display. It's a great choice for gamers and power users. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is a solid option for those seeking a well-rounded phone with a clean software experience and a slightly more understated design.