iQOO 9 vs Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance, Camera, and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and incredibly fast charging, the iQOO 9 is the clear winner. However, the Pixel 6 Pro’s superior camera system, unique software features powered by the Tensor chip, and longer software support make it the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those deeply integrated into the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 9 | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 23 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 02 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Panda Glass), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 75.1 x 8.6 or 8.7 mm | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 200 g / 202 g (7.05 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Splash and dust resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Monster Touch support | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 18 min | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 4350 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Legend, Alpha, Phoenix Orange | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | - | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 510 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 105h | Endurance rating 84h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.5 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 745168 (v8), 852898 (v9) GeekBench: 3503 (v5.1) GFXBench: 65fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 9
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 888+ processor
- Potentially longer battery life (105h endurance)
- Lower peak display brightness
- Camera likely less sophisticated than Pixel 6 Pro
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Superior camera system with Google’s computational photography
- Google Tensor chip for AI and machine learning features
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Significantly slower charging speeds
- Shorter battery life (84h endurance)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature displays with an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels. However, the Pixel 6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter panel at 846 nits measured, compared to the iQOO 9’s 749 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight for the Pixel 6 Pro. While both offer excellent viewing experiences, the Pixel 6 Pro’s higher peak brightness provides a tangible advantage in outdoor scenarios. Neither specification details refresh rate, but both are expected to have high refresh rate panels.
Camera Comparison
The context data only indicates 'Photo / Video' capabilities for both. However, the Pixel 6 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging the Tensor chip for features like Real Tone and Magic Eraser. The Pixel 6 Pro’s camera system is likely to have a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The iQOO 9, while capable, likely focuses on delivering vibrant, social media-ready images. Without specific sensor details, the Pixel 6 Pro is expected to have a more versatile and higher-quality camera system.
Performance
The iQOO 9 is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with a prime Cortex-X1 core clocked at 2.99 GHz. The Pixel 6 Pro utilizes Google’s in-house Tensor chip (5nm) with a slightly different core configuration: 2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1, 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55. While both chips are 5nm, the Snapdragon 888+ is known for its strong sustained performance, particularly in gaming, due to its mature optimization. The Tensor chip excels in AI and machine learning tasks, powering features like Magic Eraser and improved voice recognition. The iQOO 9’s focus is on brute force, while the Pixel 6 Pro prioritizes intelligent processing.
Battery Life
The iQOO 9 has an endurance rating of 105 hours, while the Pixel 6 Pro manages 84 hours. This suggests the iQOO 9 offers better battery life, despite having a potentially smaller battery capacity (not specified). However, the iQOO 9’s true advantage lies in its 120W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 6 minutes and 100% in 18 minutes. The Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W wired charging (and 23W wireless) is significantly slower, taking 30 minutes to reach 50%. The iQOO 9’s charging speed is a game-changer for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO 9 if you need a phone optimized for demanding mobile games, require the fastest possible charging speeds, and prioritize raw processing power. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a best-in-class camera experience, value Google’s AI-powered features, and desire a clean, consistently updated Android experience with long-term software support.