vivo continues to deliver compelling smartphones, and the iQOO 9 SE and V27 Pro are prime examples. Both offer impressive features, but cater to slightly different users. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which device best suits your priorities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V27 Pro emerges as the overall winner thanks to its significantly longer battery life and brighter display. While the iQOO 9 SE boasts a Snapdragon 888 for raw power, the V27 Pro's balanced package and superior endurance make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 23 | 2023, March 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 02 | Available. Released 2023, March 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 76.4 x 8.4 mm (6.43 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| | Splash and dust resistant | Color changing back panel color |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 14 min, 100% in 39 min | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min, 72% in 30 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Space Fusion, Sunset Sierra | Magic Blue, Noble Black |
| Models | - | V2230 |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.22 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 87h
|
Endurance rating 121h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
-29.1 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 727771 (v8), 846231 (v9)
GeekBench: 3442 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 64fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 846767 (v9)
GeekBench: 3933 (v5.1), 3421 (v6)
GFXBench: 57fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 9 SE
- Excellent performance for gaming
- Fast 66W charging
- Competitive price
- Shorter battery life
- Potentially less versatile camera
- Lower display brightness
vivo V27 Pro
- Exceptional battery life
- Brighter display
- Versatile camera system
- Stylish design
- Slightly slower performance than iQOO 9 SE
- 66W charging is still not the fastest
Display Comparison
The vivo V27 Pro takes the lead in the display department with a measured peak brightness of 978 nits, significantly brighter than the iQOO 9 SE's 863 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (Infinite nominal), but the V27 Pro's higher brightness provides better visibility in direct sunlight. Both likely use AMOLED panels with vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the V27 Pro is expected to have a more versatile setup, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing. The iQOO 9 SE's camera is still good, but the V27 Pro likely offers better low-light performance and more creative options. Specific camera specs are missing, but the V27 Pro generally has a reputation for better camera quality.
Performance
The iQOO 9 SE's Snapdragon 888 delivers impressive raw performance, particularly for gaming. While the Dimensity 8200 in the V27 Pro is a capable chipset, the 888 generally offers a slight edge in GPU performance. However, the Dimensity 8200 is more efficient, contributing to the V27 Pro's better battery life.
Battery Life
The vivo V27 Pro dominates in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 121 hours compared to the iQOO 9 SE's 87 hours. This translates to significantly longer usage between charges, making the V27 Pro a more practical choice for users who don't want to worry about battery anxiety.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO 9 SE is ideal for gamers and power users who prioritize performance above all else and don't mind frequent charging. The vivo V27 Pro is perfect for users who value all-day battery life, a vibrant display, and a well-rounded camera system, making it a great daily driver.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the iQOO 9 SE good for gaming?
Yes, the iQOO 9 SE's Snapdragon 888 chipset provides excellent gaming performance, although the V27 Pro is also capable.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The vivo V27 Pro has significantly better battery life with an endurance rating of 121 hours compared to the iQOO 9 SE's 87 hours.