vivo iQOO 9 SE vs iQOO 9: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO 9 takes the crown with its significantly faster charging, slightly better CPU, and longer battery life. However, the iQOO 9 SE remains a compelling option for budget-conscious gamers who still want a powerful Snapdragon 888 experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 9 SE | vivo iQOO 9 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 23 | 2022, February 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 02 | Available. Released 2022, March 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Panda Glass), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 76.4 x 8.4 mm (6.43 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) | 159.1 x 75.1 x 8.6 or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 200 g / 202 g (7.05 oz) |
| Splash and dust resistant | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| - | Monster Touch support | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 14 min, 100% in 39 min | 120W wired, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 18 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 4350 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Space Fusion, Sunset Sierra | Legend, Alpha, Phoenix Orange |
| Price | About 400 EUR | About 510 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 87h | Endurance rating 105h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.1 LUFS (Good) | -25.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 727771 (v8), 846231 (v9) GeekBench: 3442 (v5.1) GFXBench: 64fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 745168 (v8), 852898 (v9) GeekBench: 3503 (v5.1) GFXBench: 65fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 9 SE
- Slightly brighter display
- Competitive price
- Smooth 120Hz AMOLED display
- Capable Snapdragon 888 performance
- Shorter battery life
- Slower charging speed
- Potentially slightly less refined camera
vivo iQOO 9
- Longer battery life
- Faster 120W charging
- Slightly better performance (Snapdragon 888+)
- Potentially better camera processing
- Higher price
- Slightly lower peak brightness compared to SE
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth visuals. The iQOO 9 SE boasts a slightly higher peak brightness of 863 nits compared to the iQOO 9's 749 nits, potentially offering better visibility in direct sunlight. Both have a nominal infinite contrast ratio, indicating deep blacks and vibrant colors. While both are great, the iQOO 9 SE has a slight edge in brightness.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited in the provided data. However, both phones are expected to offer capable camera systems for their price range. The iQOO 9 likely has slightly improved image processing due to the 888+ chipset. Both likely feature a main sensor around 48MP, an ultrawide lens, and a macro lens. Real-world camera performance would require a more in-depth test.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Snapdragon 888, but the iQOO 9 utilizes the slightly more powerful Snapdragon 888+. This translates to a marginal performance boost in demanding tasks and games. The iQOO 9 also has a slightly higher CPU clock speed (2.99 GHz vs 2.84 GHz). While both offer flagship-level performance, the iQOO 9 holds a slight advantage.
Battery Life
The iQOO 9 significantly outperforms the iQOO 9 SE in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 105 hours compared to 87 hours. This difference is substantial and will be noticeable in daily usage. The iQOO 9's 120W charging is also a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast charging times (50% in 6 minutes, 100% in 18 minutes) compared to the iQOO 9 SE's 66W charging (50% in 14 minutes, 100% in 39 minutes).
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo iQOO 9 SE? Gamers on a tighter budget who prioritize a smooth gaming experience and don't need the absolute fastest charging. Who should buy the vivo iQOO 9? Users who demand the quickest charging speeds, slightly improved performance, and extended battery life for all-day use.