iQOO 9 vs. Oppo Find X5 Pro: A Deep Dive into China's Top Android Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing ultimate charging speed and gaming performance, the iQOO 9 is the clear winner. Its 120W charging dwarfs the Oppo's 80W, and while both share the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, the iQOO's focus on thermal management suggests better sustained performance. However, the Oppo Find X5 Pro offers a more balanced experience with superior wireless charging and a potentially more versatile camera system.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 9 (China) | Oppo Find X5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 05 | 2022, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 12 | Available. Released 2022, March 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 76.7 x 8.4 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 163.7 x 73.9 x 8.5 or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 218 g or 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10, 1500 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - GlobalOcta-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - China |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - GlobalMediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) - China |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 - GlobalMali-G710 MC10 - China |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS (3-axis sensor-shift, 2-axis lens-shift) 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Oppo Find X5 Pro Dimensity model has no MariSilicon X image chip, 5-axis OIS and Hasselblad’s color calibration | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100% in 19 min 10W reverse wireless | 80W wired, PD, 50% in 12 min 50W wireless, 100% in 47 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White (BMW M branding), Orange, Black | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White, Blue (eco leather) |
| Models | V2171A | PFEM10, CPH2305, PFFM20 |
| Price | About 560 EUR | € 449.00 / $ 430.24 / £ 1,049.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1012896 (v9) GeekBench: 3433 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 9 (China)
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Potentially better sustained gaming performance due to thermal focus
- Aggressive pricing (likely, given iQOO's brand positioning)
- Limited information on display specs
- Camera system details are unknown
Oppo Find X5 Pro
- Excellent 80W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Strong endurance rating (101 hours)
- Potentially more refined camera system
- Significantly slower charging than iQOO 9
- China variant uses Dimensity 9000, potentially creating software fragmentation
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X5 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 762 nits, suggesting a vibrant and easily viewable display in outdoor conditions. While the iQOO 9’s display specs aren’t provided, both devices likely utilize high-refresh-rate AMOLED panels. The Find X5 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio indicates a true black level, typical of OLED technology. The lack of detailed iQOO 9 display specs makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Find X5 Pro’s measured brightness gives it an edge for outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. However, Oppo is renowned for its camera prowess, and the Find X5 Pro likely benefits from advanced image processing algorithms and potentially larger sensor sizes. The absence of sensor size information for either phone makes a direct comparison impossible. The iQOO 9’s camera system is likely geared towards delivering vibrant, social media-ready images, while the Find X5 Pro may prioritize color accuracy and dynamic range. The lack of detail on both sides necessitates further investigation beyond the provided specs.
Performance
Both the iQOO 9 and the global variant of the Oppo Find X5 Pro are powered by the Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm). However, the China-specific Oppo Find X5 Pro utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (4nm). While both chipsets are flagship-level, the Dimensity 9000 features a slightly higher clocked Cortex-X2 core (3.05 GHz vs 3.00 GHz) and A710 cores (2.85 GHz vs 2.50 GHz), potentially offering a marginal CPU performance boost. Both phones utilize the same core architecture, meaning the 4nm process node ensures comparable thermal efficiency. The iQOO 9’s focus on gaming suggests optimized thermal management to minimize throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X5 Pro has an endurance rating of 101 hours, indicating solid battery life. The iQOO 9’s battery capacity is not specified, but its standout feature is its 120W wired charging, capable of a full charge in just 19 minutes. In contrast, the Oppo Find X5 Pro’s 80W charging takes approximately 12 minutes to reach 50% and 47 minutes for a full charge. The iQOO 9 also offers 100W reverse wireless charging, while the Oppo supports 50W wireless charging. The iQOO 9’s charging speed is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly, even if its overall battery life is slightly less than the Oppo.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO 9 (China) if you need the absolute fastest charging available, prioritize sustained gaming performance, and are comfortable with a potentially less polished software experience. Buy the Oppo Find X5 Pro if you prefer a more refined and balanced flagship experience, value wireless charging convenience, and prioritize camera versatility over raw speed.