vivo iQOO 8 Pro vs vivo X70 Pro+: A Clash of Flagship Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO 8 Pro takes the crown for charging speed and raw performance, boasting a blistering 120W wired charging. However, the X70 Pro+ shines with its exceptional camera system, longer battery life, and potentially a more refined overall experience. It depends on your priorities: speed or photography.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 8 Pro | vivo X70 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 17 | 2021, September 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 26 | Available. Released 2021, September 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 165 x 75.2 x 9.2 mm (6.50 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) | 164.5 x 75.2 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 209 g / 213 g (7.37 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, Funtouch OS 12 (International), OriginOS 1.0 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF, gimbal OIS |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 60mm (telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 55W wired 50W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White (BMW M branding), Black, Pilot Edition | Black, Blue, Orange |
| Models | V2141A, I2017 | V2145A, V2114 |
| Price | About 660 EUR | About 720 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 837833 (v9) GeekBench: 3469 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 8 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Slightly faster CPU clock speed
- Potentially brighter display
- Aggressive pricing
- Camera not as impressive as X70 Pro+
- Battery life shorter than X70 Pro+
- Design may be less premium
vivo X70 Pro+
- Exceptional camera system
- Longer battery life
- Premium design and build quality
- 50W wireless charging
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Slower charging speeds
- Potentially higher price
- Performance marginally slower than iQOO 8 Pro
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays, likely with 120Hz refresh rates (though the iQOO 8 Pro's specs don't explicitly state it). The X70 Pro+ boasts a 'nominal infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting superior blacks and vibrant colors, potentially due to its display technology. The iQOO 8 Pro may offer slightly better brightness, but both provide a visually stunning experience.
Camera Comparison
This is where the X70 Pro+ truly excels. While the iQOO 8 Pro has a capable camera system, the X70 Pro+ is renowned for its exceptional image quality, particularly in low light. It likely features a larger primary sensor and advanced image processing algorithms. Expect superior dynamic range, detail, and color accuracy from the X70 Pro+. The X70 Pro+ also likely has a more versatile zoom range.
Performance
While both utilize the Snapdragon 888+ chipset, the iQOO 8 Pro's CPU has a slightly higher peak clock speed on the Cortex-X1 core (2.99 GHz vs 3.0 GHz). This translates to marginally faster performance in demanding tasks, particularly gaming. However, real-world differences are likely to be minimal for most users. Both phones will handle multitasking and resource-intensive apps with ease.
Battery Life
The X70 Pro+ clearly wins in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 84 hours. The iQOO 8 Pro's battery capacity is likely smaller, and while its 120W charging is unmatched, it won't compensate for a shorter overall battery life. The X70 Pro+ offers 50W wireless charging and 5W reverse wired charging, adding to its versatility.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO 8 Pro is ideal for gamers and power users who prioritize fast charging and smooth performance. The vivo X70 Pro+ is perfect for photography enthusiasts and those who value a longer-lasting battery and a more premium feel.