vivo iQOO 8 Pro vs iQOO 9: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO 9 edges out the 8 Pro thanks to its potentially improved camera system and slightly more modern design. However, the 8 Pro's faster wireless charging and potentially better cooling solution make it a strong contender for serious gamers. It's a close call, depending on your priorities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 8 Pro | vivo iQOO 9 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 17 | 2022, February 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 26 | Available. Released 2022, March 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Panda Glass), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 165 x 75.2 x 9.2 mm (6.50 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) | 159.1 x 75.1 x 8.6 or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 200 g / 202 g (7.05 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| - | Monster Touch support | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 60mm (telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 120W wired, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 18 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 4350 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White (BMW M branding), Black, Pilot Edition | Legend, Alpha, Phoenix Orange |
| Models | V2141A, I2017 | - |
| Price | About 660 EUR | About 510 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 105h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 745168 (v8), 852898 (v9) GeekBench: 3503 (v5.1) GFXBench: 65fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 8 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Fast 50W wireless charging
- Potentially better cooling for sustained performance
- Excellent display
- Camera potentially less advanced than iQOO 9
- Slightly older design
vivo iQOO 9
- Potentially improved camera system
- Slightly faster 120W wired charging
- Modern design
- High peak brightness display
- No wireless charging
- Thermal management potentially less effective than 8 Pro
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent displays, but the iQOO 9 boasts a measured peak brightness of 749 nits, suggesting better outdoor visibility. The iQOO 8 Pro's display is likely very good, but lacks specific brightness data. The iQOO 9's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a nominal value and doesn't necessarily translate to a significantly better viewing experience in practice. Both likely use AMOLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse in the provided specs. However, the iQOO 9 is generally considered to have a more advanced camera system. Expect improvements in image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The iQOO 8 Pro's camera is still capable, but likely not as refined.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Snapdragon 888+ chipset, ensuring flagship-level performance. While the hardware is identical, the iQOO 9 might benefit from slightly improved thermal management due to potential design differences, leading to sustained performance during extended gaming sessions. Software optimization could also play a role.
Battery Life
Both phones offer impressive battery life, with the iQOO 9 claiming an endurance rating of 105 hours. The iQOO 8 Pro also boasts excellent battery life. The iQOO 9's 120W wired charging is slightly faster (50% in 6 minutes vs 18 minutes for 100% on the 8 Pro), offering quicker top-ups. The iQOO 8 Pro has 50W wireless charging, which the iQOO 9 lacks.
Buying Guide
The vivo iQOO 8 Pro is ideal for gamers prioritizing blazing-fast wired and wireless charging and potentially superior cooling. The iQOO 9 is a better choice for users who value a potentially improved camera experience and a more contemporary design, while still enjoying excellent performance.