iQOO 8 Pro vs Sony Xperia 1 III: A Deep Dive into Performance, Camera, and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing speed and value, the iQOO 8 Pro emerges as the winner. Its 120W charging is a game-changer, and the Snapdragon 888+ offers a slight performance edge. However, the Xperia 1 III remains a compelling choice for professionals needing top-tier video capabilities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 8 Pro | Sony Xperia 1 III |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA (specific) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 17 | 2021, April 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 26 | Available. Released 2021, August 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165 x 75.2 x 9.2 mm (6.50 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) | 165 x 71 x 8.2 mm (6.50 x 2.80 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 186 g / 187.1 g (mmWave) (6.56 oz) |
| - | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) | 1644 x 3840 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~643 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 98.6 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1500 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020 |
| - | Runs at 1096 x 2560 pixels except for select use cases | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.X | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 60mm (telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 0.8µm, AF | 12 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.3, 70mm (telephoto), f/2.8, 105mm (telephoto), 1/2.9", dual pixel PDAF, 3x/4.4x optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 124˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.6", dual pixel PDAF 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/25/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| - | Native Sony Alpha camera support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 30W wired, PD, 50% in 30 min Wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White (BMW M branding), Black, Pilot Edition | Frosted Black, Frosted Gray, Frosted Purple |
| Models | V2141A, I2017 | XQBC62/V, XQBC52V.UKCX, SO-51B, SOG03, A101SO, XQ-BC62, XQ-BC72, XQ-BC52, XQ-BC01, XQ-BC11, XQ-BC21, XQ-BC72 |
| Price | About 660 EUR | € 505.26 / $ 903.43 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 82h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 607423 (v8) GeekBench: 3515 (v5.1) GFXBench: 54fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 8 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Slightly more powerful Snapdragon 888+ chipset
- 50W Wireless and 10W Reverse Wireless Charging
- Camera details are limited, making a direct comparison difficult
- Display specifications are incomplete
Sony Xperia 1 III
- Exceptional video recording capabilities
- High peak brightness and excellent contrast ratio
- Focus on color accuracy for professional use
- Significantly slower 30W charging
- Less powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset
Display Comparison
Both phones utilize 6.7-inch displays with similar resolutions, but diverge in their approach. The Xperia 1 III boasts a 620 nit peak brightness, a respectable figure, but the iQOO 8 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, suggesting a potential advantage in brightness. The Xperia 1 III’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio hints at excellent black levels, typical of OLED panels. However, without PWM dimming rate data for the iQOO 8 Pro, it’s difficult to assess potential flicker-related issues for sensitive users. The Xperia 1 III’s focus on color accuracy is evident in its marketing, appealing to professionals needing precise color representation.
Camera Comparison
The Xperia 1 III is clearly positioned as a photography and videography powerhouse. While specific sensor details are absent, Sony’s emphasis on ‘Photo / Video’ suggests a comprehensive camera system. The iQOO 8 Pro’s camera specifications are not detailed, making a direct comparison difficult. However, Sony’s history of advanced image processing and optical stabilization (OIS) suggests a superior experience for professional-level content creation. The Xperia 1 III likely excels in video recording, offering features like 4K HDR and cinematic color profiles. The iQOO 8 Pro may focus more on computational photography for everyday shots.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 series, but the iQOO 8 Pro features the Snapdragon 888+ 5G, clocked slightly higher at 2.99 GHz versus the Xperia 1 III’s 2.84 GHz. While the core architecture (1x Cortex-X1, 3x Cortex-A78, 4x Cortex-A55) is identical, the ‘+’ variant generally offers improved thermal performance and sustained clock speeds. Both utilize an octa-core CPU configuration. The iQOO 8 Pro’s potential for less thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions gives it a slight edge, though real-world differences may be minimal. RAM specifications are not provided for either device, but both are expected to utilize LPDDR5 for fast memory access.
Battery Life
The Xperia 1 III boasts an endurance rating of 82 hours, indicating solid battery life. However, the iQOO 8 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a standout feature, achieving a full charge in just 18 minutes. The Xperia 1 III’s 30W charging, taking 30 minutes to reach 50%, pales in comparison. The iQOO 8 Pro also offers 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless charging, features not explicitly mentioned for the Xperia 1 III. While the Xperia 1 III’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the iQOO 8 Pro’s charging speed effectively mitigates concerns about battery size for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO 8 Pro if you need blistering fast charging, prioritize gaming performance, and want a phone that can keep up with a demanding lifestyle. Buy the Sony Xperia 1 III if you are a content creator who values exceptional video recording features, a natural color science, and a more refined, cinematic user experience.