iQOO 5 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Speed and Endurance

Launched in a similar timeframe, the vivo iQOO 5 Pro and Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra represent peak 2020 Android flagship performance. Both devices center around the Snapdragon 865, but diverge significantly in charging implementation, battery endurance, and overall user experience. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which phone delivers the best value today.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing the absolute fastest wired charging and a slightly more streamlined experience, the iQOO 5 Pro emerges as the winner. It achieves a full charge in just 15 minutes. However, the Mi 10 Ultra’s 50W wireless charging and slightly better overall battery endurance make it a compelling alternative for those who value convenience.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo iQOO 5 Pro 5G Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41
5G bands1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
 CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMACDMA2000 1xEV-DO
Launch
Announced2020, August 17. Released 2020, August 242020, August 11. Released 2020, August 16
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame
Dimensions159.6 x 73.3 x 8.9 mm (6.28 x 2.89 x 0.35 in)162.4 x 75.1 x 9.5 mm (6.39 x 2.96 x 0.37 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight198 g (6.98 oz)221.8 g (7.83 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density)1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~386 ppi density)
Size6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio)6.67 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 1120 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 650
OSAndroid 10, IQOO UI 1.5Android 10, MIUI 12.5
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM
 UFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Main Camera
FeaturesDual-LED flash, HDR, panoramaLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad-48 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.32", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/4.1, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom 20 MP, f/2.2, 128˚, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm, PDAF
Triple50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm-
Video8K, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10 rec.
Selfie camera
FeaturesPanoramaHDR
Single16 MP, f/2.5, (wide)20 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
 32-bit/192kHz audio24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEOGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Battery
Charging120W wired, 50% in 5 min, 100% in 15 min Reverse wired120W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 41% in 5 min, 100% in 23 min 50W wireless, 100% in 40 min 10W reverse wireless
Type4000 mAhLi-Ion 4500 mAh, graphene-enhanced
Misc
ColorsWhite, BlackObsidian Black, Mercury Silver, Transparent Edition
Modelsv2025aM2007J1SC
PriceAbout 610 EURAbout 650 EUR
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 85h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -24.6 LUFS (Very good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 638497 (v8) GeekBench: 3248 (v5.1) GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo iQOO 5 Pro 5G

  • Blazing-fast 120W wired charging (15 minutes to full)
  • Potentially superior thermal management for gaming
  • Streamlined user experience (typical of iQOO)

  • No wireless charging
  • Limited camera details in provided data

Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra

  • 50W wireless charging for added convenience
  • Potentially more versatile camera system (based on market reports)
  • Slightly better overall battery endurance

  • Slower 120W wired charging (23 minutes to full)
  • Higher price point (likely, given 'Ultra' branding)

Display Comparison

Both the iQOO 5 Pro and Mi 10 Ultra share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting both utilize AMOLED panels. However, specific details like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing. Given the Mi 10 Ultra’s positioning as an ‘Ultra’ device, it likely boasts a slightly more refined display experience, potentially with higher peak brightness for HDR content. Without further data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Mi 10 Ultra’s premium branding suggests a more advanced panel.

Camera Comparison

The provided data only indicates both phones have 'Photo / Video' capabilities. The Mi 10 Ultra is known for its advanced camera system, including a large 108MP main sensor and periscope zoom lens (based on market knowledge). The iQOO 5 Pro’s camera specs are less publicized. While both likely deliver excellent image quality, the Mi 10 Ultra’s hardware suggests a more versatile and capable camera system, particularly in low-light conditions and zoom photography. The absence of sensor size details for the iQOO 5 Pro hinders a direct comparison.

Performance

Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+), featuring the same Octa-core CPU configuration (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55). Therefore, raw CPU performance will be nearly identical. The key differentiator will be thermal management and sustained performance. The iQOO brand historically focuses on gaming, suggesting a more robust cooling solution to prevent throttling under sustained load. RAM speed (LPDDR5x) is not specified, but is a critical factor in overall system responsiveness. Without this data, it's difficult to assess a performance advantage.

Battery Life

Both phones feature 120W wired charging, but the implementation differs. The iQOO 5 Pro reaches 100% in 15 minutes, while the Mi 10 Ultra takes 23 minutes. This 8-minute difference is significant for users prioritizing speed. The Mi 10 Ultra also offers 50W wireless charging (100% in 40 minutes) and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent in the iQOO 5 Pro. Both have an endurance rating of 85h, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potential differences in battery capacity (not specified). The Mi 10 Ultra’s wireless charging capabilities provide a clear advantage for convenience.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo iQOO 5 Pro if you need the absolute fastest wired charging speeds available and prioritize a gaming-focused experience. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra if you prefer the convenience of fast wireless charging, a more versatile camera system (based on market reports, though not detailed in provided data), and a slightly longer-lasting battery between charges.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ How much faster is the iQOO 5 Pro's 120W charging compared to the Mi 10 Ultra in a real-world scenario?
The iQOO 5 Pro charges from 0-100% in 15 minutes, while the Mi 10 Ultra takes 23 minutes. This 8-minute difference translates to a significant time saving, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The Mi 10 Ultra's wireless charging offers a different convenience, but doesn't match the speed of either phone's wired charging.
❓ Does the lack of wireless charging on the iQOO 5 Pro significantly impact its usability?
For users heavily invested in wireless charging ecosystems, the absence of this feature on the iQOO 5 Pro is a notable drawback. However, the incredibly fast 120W wired charging mitigates this issue for many, as a quick 5-10 minute charge can provide hours of usage. It depends on your charging habits and infrastructure.
❓ Given both phones have the Snapdragon 865, will I notice a performance difference in demanding games?
While the core processing power is identical, the iQOO 5 Pro’s potential for superior thermal management could lead to more sustained performance during extended gaming sessions. A more effective cooling system prevents the CPU and GPU from throttling as quickly, maintaining higher frame rates for longer periods. However, without independent thermal testing, this remains speculative.