iQOO 5 Pro vs Oppo Find X2 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Charging Speed

Both the vivo iQOO 5 Pro and the Oppo Find X2 Pro represent the pinnacle of Android flagship design from 2020, powered by the Snapdragon 865. However, they diverge significantly in their approach to user experience, with the iQOO 5 Pro prioritizing charging speed and gaming features, while the Find X2 Pro focuses on display quality and refined aesthetics. This comparison dissects these differences to help you choose the right device.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing battery convenience, the iQOO 5 Pro is the clear winner. Its 120W charging, capable of a full charge in just 15 minutes, dramatically reduces downtime. While the Find X2 Pro boasts excellent battery endurance and a stunning display, the iQOO 5 Pro’s charging speed is a game-changer.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo iQOO 5 Pro 5G Oppo Find X2 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66
5G bands1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA-
Launch
Announced2020, August 17. Released 2020, August 242020, March 06
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2020, March 06
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or leather back, aluminum frame
Dimensions159.6 x 73.3 x 8.9 mm (6.28 x 2.89 x 0.35 in)165.2 x 74.4 x 8.8 mm (Ceramic) / 9.5mm (Leather)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight198 g (6.98 oz)217 g (Ceramic) / 200 g (Leather) (7.05 oz)
 -IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 6
Resolution1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density)1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density)
Size6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio)6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 650
OSAndroid 10, IQOO UI 1.5Android 10, ColorOS 7.1
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
 UFS 3.1UFS 3.0
Main Camera
FeaturesDual-LED flash, HDR, panoramaLaser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Triple50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 129mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF
Video8K, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR
Selfie camera
FeaturesPanoramaPanorama
Single16 MP, f/2.5, (wide)32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
 32-bit/192kHz audio-
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.1, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEOGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C, OTGUSB Type-C 3.1, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Battery
Charging120W wired, 50% in 5 min, 100% in 15 min Reverse wired65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min
Type4000 mAhLi-Po 4260 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsWhite, BlackBlack, Orange, Gray, Green, Lamborghini Edition
Modelsv2025aCPH2025, PDEM30, OPG01
PriceAbout 610 EURAbout 300 EUR
Tests
Battery life-Endurance rating 88h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -25.2 LUFS (Very good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 593717 (v8) GeekBench: 13245 (v4.4), 3269 (v5.1) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo iQOO 5 Pro 5G

  • Blazing-fast 120W charging
  • Potentially better sustained performance due to cooling
  • Likely optimized for gaming

  • Display specifications are unknown
  • Camera details are limited

Oppo Find X2 Pro

  • Excellent 88-hour battery endurance
  • High peak brightness (871 nits)
  • Infinite contrast ratio for immersive viewing

  • Significantly slower charging (38 minutes)
  • May throttle under sustained load

Display Comparison

Both devices utilize the Snapdragon 865, but their displays differ significantly. The Oppo Find X2 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 871 nits, offering excellent visibility in bright conditions, and an infinite contrast ratio. While the iQOO 5 Pro’s display specs aren’t provided, the Find X2 Pro’s panel is widely regarded as one of the best of its generation. The Find X2 Pro’s display is geared towards color accuracy and viewing angles, making it superior for content creators and media consumers. The iQOO 5 Pro likely prioritizes refresh rate for gaming, but lacks the detailed display specifications of the Oppo.

Camera Comparison

Both devices feature capable camera systems, but detailed specifications are limited. Both are described as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities. The iQOO 5 Pro’s camera system is likely tuned for vibrant, social media-ready images, while the Find X2 Pro likely aims for more natural color reproduction. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of detail suggests neither phone boasts a groundbreaking camera system, focusing instead on overall flagship experience.

Performance

Both phones are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+), featuring an octa-core CPU configuration (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55). Performance will be largely identical in most tasks. However, the iQOO 5 Pro’s cooling solution, though not detailed in the provided data, is likely more aggressive given its focus on gaming. This could translate to slightly sustained performance under heavy load, mitigating potential throttling. The RAM configuration is not specified, but both likely utilize LPDDR5 for fast memory access.

Battery Life

The Oppo Find X2 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 88 hours, indicating excellent battery life. However, the iQOO 5 Pro’s 120W wired charging is the standout feature. Achieving 50% charge in just 5 minutes and 100% in 15 minutes is significantly faster than the Find X2 Pro’s 65W charging, which takes 38 minutes for a full charge. This difference in charging speed dramatically alters the user experience, minimizing downtime and offering unparalleled convenience. While the Find X2 Pro’s 88-hour endurance is impressive, the iQOO 5 Pro’s charging speed effectively negates the need to worry about battery anxiety.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo iQOO 5 Pro if you need the absolute fastest charging available and frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery quickly, or if you are a mobile gamer who values rapid return to play. Buy the Oppo Find X2 Pro if you prioritize a premium display experience, long-lasting battery life, and a more understated, refined design aesthetic. The Find X2 Pro is ideal for media consumption and users who don't mind a longer charging cycle.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ How much faster is the iQOO 5 Pro's charging compared to the Find X2 Pro in a real-world scenario?
The iQOO 5 Pro can gain a significant charge during a typical commute. While the Find X2 Pro is charging, you could fully charge the iQOO 5 Pro multiple times. This is especially useful for users who frequently travel or have limited access to power outlets.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 865 in either phone exhibit noticeable thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 865 is known to throttle under sustained load. While both phones share the same chipset, the iQOO 5 Pro likely has a more robust cooling system geared towards gaming, potentially mitigating throttling compared to the Find X2 Pro. However, neither phone will maintain peak performance indefinitely during demanding tasks.
❓ Is the difference in display quality between the two phones noticeable for everyday use?
The Oppo Find X2 Pro's display is considered exceptional, offering vibrant colors and excellent clarity. While the iQOO 5 Pro's display is likely good, the Find X2 Pro's higher peak brightness and contrast ratio will be more noticeable when viewing HDR content or using the phone outdoors.