iQOO 5 Pro vs Huawei P40 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Speed, Camera, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing speed and gaming, the iQOO 5 Pro is the clear winner. Its 120W charging dramatically reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 865 offers strong performance. However, the P40 Pro+ remains a compelling choice for photography enthusiasts valuing a refined camera experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 5 Pro 5G | Huawei P40 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 17. Released 2020, August 24 | 2020, March 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, June 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, ceramic back, ceramic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 73.3 x 8.9 mm (6.28 x 2.89 x 0.35 in) | 158.2 x 72.6 x 9 mm (6.23 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 226 g (7.97 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1200 x 2640 pixels (~441 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | OLED, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Kirin 990 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Mali-G76 MP16 |
| OS | Android 10, IQOO UI 1.5 | Android 10, EMUI 10.1, no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica optics, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/4.4, 240mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 10x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 40 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), 1/1.54", PDAF TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 8K, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720@7680fps, 1080p@960fps, HDR; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF IR TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Infrared Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 5 min, 100% in 15 min Reverse wired | 40W wired 40W wireless 27W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Black | White Ceramic, Black Ceramic |
| Models | v2025a | ELS-N39, ELS-AN10 |
| Price | About 610 EUR | About 1000 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 95h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 529687 (v8) GeekBench: 3203 (v5.1) GFXBench: 31fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 5 Pro 5G
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 865 processor
- Excellent gaming performance
- Camera details are lacking
- Battery capacity not specified
Huawei P40 Pro+
- Exceptional camera system
- High peak display brightness
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Slower charging speeds
- Older Kirin 990 chipset
Display Comparison
The Huawei P40 Pro+ boasts a measured peak brightness of 760 nits, providing excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the iQOO 5 Pro’s display specs aren’t provided, it’s likely to be competitive, but the P40 Pro+ has a clear advantage in measured brightness. Both displays feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels. The absence of refresh rate information for the iQOO 5 Pro is a notable omission, while the P40 Pro+ doesn’t specify it either, suggesting neither prioritizes high refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
The Huawei P40 Pro+ is explicitly marketed for its camera prowess, though specific sensor details are missing. Its strength lies in its overall image processing and versatility. The iQOO 5 Pro’s camera specifications are not detailed, making a direct comparison difficult. However, given iQOO’s focus on performance, the P40 Pro+ likely holds an edge in image quality and features, particularly in low-light scenarios and zoom capabilities. The P40 Pro+'s reputation for video recording quality is also a significant advantage.
Performance
The iQOO 5 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7nm+) chipset offers a strong foundation for performance, utilizing an octa-core configuration with a prime Cortex-A77 core clocked at 2.84 GHz. The Huawei P40 Pro+ employs the Kirin 990 5G (7nm+), featuring a dual Cortex-A76 core setup clocked slightly higher at 2.86 GHz. While clock speeds are close, the Snapdragon 865 generally demonstrates superior GPU performance, making the iQOO 5 Pro the better choice for demanding mobile games. The iQOO 5 Pro benefits from potentially faster LPDDR5 RAM, though specifics aren’t provided, further enhancing its gaming capabilities.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 95 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite differing capacities (not specified for the iQOO 5 Pro). However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The iQOO 5 Pro’s 120W wired charging is revolutionary, achieving 50% charge in just 5 minutes and a full charge in 15 minutes. The P40 Pro+ offers 40W wired charging, 40W wireless charging, and 27W reverse wireless charging, which are respectable but significantly slower than the iQOO 5 Pro. This charging speed difference is the iQOO 5 Pro’s most significant advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO 5 Pro 5G if you need a phone that charges incredibly fast, excels in gaming, and offers a modern chipset. Buy the Huawei P40 Pro+ if you prioritize a versatile and well-regarded camera system, and prefer a more established brand with a focus on photographic quality, even if it means sacrificing charging speed and the latest chipset.