iQOO 5 Pro vs Asus ROG Phone 3: A Deep Dive into Gaming and Charging Champions

The vivo iQOO 5 Pro 5G and Asus ROG Phone 3 represent distinct approaches to the high-performance Android smartphone market. The iQOO 5 Pro prioritizes blazing-fast charging and a refined experience, while the ROG Phone 3 doubles down on gaming-centric features and sustained performance. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right powerhouse.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a balanced experience, the iQOO 5 Pro emerges as the winner. Its 120W charging is a game-changer, replenishing the battery in just 15 minutes. However, dedicated gamers who value sustained performance and a feature-rich gaming ecosystem will find the ROG Phone 3 more compelling.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo iQOO 5 Pro 5G Asus ROG Phone 3
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 - A version
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - A version
5G bands1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - A version
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (6CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G 4.4 Gbps DL
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA-
Launch
Announced2020, August 17. Released 2020, August 242020, July 22. Released 2020, July 23
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame
Dimensions159.6 x 73.3 x 8.9 mm (6.28 x 2.89 x 0.35 in)171 x 78 x 9.9 mm (6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight198 g (6.98 oz)240 g (8.47 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 6
Resolution1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density)1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~391 ppi density)
Size6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio)6.59 inches, 106.6 cm2 (~79.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 650 nits (typ)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.10 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G+ (7 nm+)
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 650
OSAndroid 10, IQOO UI 1.5Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, ROG UI
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM
 UFS 3.1-
Main Camera
FeaturesDual-LED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 11mm, 125˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro)
Video8K, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesPanoramaPanorama, HDR
Single16 MP, f/2.5, (wide)24 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 0.9µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with DTS:X stereo speakers (2 dedicated amplifiers)
 32-bit/192kHz audio-
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEOGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C, OTGUSB Type-C 3.1 (side), USB Type-C 2.0 (bottom), OTG, accessory connector
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging120W wired, 50% in 5 min, 100% in 15 min Reverse wired30W wired, PD3.0, QC4 10W reverse wired
Type4000 mAhLi-Po 6000 mAh
Misc
ColorsWhite, BlackBlack Glare
Modelsv2025aASUS_I003D, ZS661KS, I003DD, I003D
PriceAbout 610 EURAbout 650 EUR
SAR-0.74 W/kg (head)     1.50 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 120h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -23.1 LUFS (Very good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 621932 (v8) GeekBench: 13306 (v4.4), 3386 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo iQOO 5 Pro 5G

  • Unrivaled 120W fast charging
  • Sleek and modern design
  • Competitive performance with Snapdragon 865

  • Limited camera details
  • Potentially less sustained performance than ROG Phone 3

Asus ROG Phone 3

  • Slightly faster CPU performance (Snapdragon 865+)
  • Gaming-focused features and ecosystem
  • Good display brightness and contrast

  • Significantly slower 30W charging
  • Larger and heavier form factor

Display Comparison

Both phones utilize the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G platform, but differ in display characteristics. The ROG Phone 3 boasts a measured peak brightness of 719 nits, providing good visibility outdoors. While the iQOO 5 Pro’s display specs aren’t provided, it’s reasonable to expect similar or slightly lower peak brightness given the focus on other areas. The ROG Phone 3’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a true OLED panel, delivering deep blacks. The iQOO 5 Pro’s panel type is unknown, but its overall experience is likely optimized for color accuracy and responsiveness.

Camera Comparison

Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. The ROG Phone 3’s camera system is likely geared towards general-purpose photography, while the iQOO 5 Pro may prioritize image processing for social media sharing. The absence of detailed camera specs suggests neither phone is a primary focus for photography enthusiasts.

Performance

The Asus ROG Phone 3 edges out the iQOO 5 Pro in raw CPU performance thanks to the Snapdragon 865 5G+ chipset clocked at 3.10 GHz versus the iQOO 5 Pro’s 2.84 GHz Snapdragon 865. This difference, while not massive, will be noticeable in CPU-intensive tasks and sustained gaming loads. Both phones share the same CPU core configuration (1x Cortex-A77 at higher clock, 3x Cortex-A77, 4x Cortex-A55), but the ROG Phone 3’s higher clock speed provides a slight advantage. Both utilize LPDDR5 RAM, ensuring fast memory access, but the specific RAM speed isn’t specified. The ROG Phone 3’s larger chassis likely allows for a more sophisticated cooling system, potentially mitigating thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.

Battery Life

Both the iQOO 5 Pro and ROG Phone 3 achieve an endurance rating of 120 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the iQOO 5 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a monumental advantage, achieving 50% charge in just 5 minutes and a full charge in 15 minutes. The ROG Phone 3’s 30W charging, while supporting PD3.0 and QC4, is significantly slower. The iQOO 5 Pro also offers reverse wired charging, a feature present on the ROG Phone 3 but at a lower 10W output. This charging speed disparity makes the iQOO 5 Pro ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo iQOO 5 Pro 5G if you need the absolute fastest charging speeds available, a sleek design, and a phone that excels in everyday tasks alongside gaming. Buy the Asus ROG Phone 3 if you prefer a dedicated gaming phone with a focus on long-term performance, a larger display, and a robust suite of gaming accessories and software features.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ How much faster is the iQOO 5 Pro's 120W charging compared to the ROG Phone 3's 30W charging in real-world use?
The iQOO 5 Pro can charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 15 minutes, while the ROG Phone 3 takes considerably longer – likely over an hour. This means you can quickly top up the iQOO 5 Pro during short breaks, whereas the ROG Phone 3 requires a more substantial charging period.
❓ Will the Snapdragon 865+ in the ROG Phone 3 provide a noticeable gaming advantage over the Snapdragon 865 in the iQOO 5 Pro?
The ROG Phone 3’s Snapdragon 865+ offers a slight performance edge, particularly in sustained gaming scenarios. However, the difference is unlikely to be dramatic in most games. The ROG Phone 3’s superior cooling system may also contribute to more consistent performance during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Does the ROG Phone 3's gaming-specific software features justify choosing it over the iQOO 5 Pro for a casual gamer?
For casual gamers, the ROG Phone 3’s gaming software (Armoury Crate) and accessories might be overkill. The iQOO 5 Pro provides a more balanced experience with sufficient performance for most games and the added benefit of incredibly fast charging.