iQOO 5 5G vs Realme X50 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon 865 Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience and longevity, the Realme X50 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its 65W SuperDart charging significantly reduces downtime (35 minutes to full) compared to the iQOO 5’s 55W, and the reported 90-hour endurance rating suggests better real-world battery performance despite similar capacities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 5 5G | Realme X50 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 17. Released 2020, August 24 | 2020, February 24. Released 2020, March 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160 x 75.6 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, IQOO UI 1.5 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.5, 54mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm (ultrawide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 8K, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired, 100% in 50 min Reverse wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gray | Moss Green, Rust Red |
| Models | V2024A | RMX2075, RMX2071, RMX2076 |
| Price | About 490 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 90h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 592447 (v8) GeekBench: 3175 (v5.1) GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 5 5G
- Potentially refined vivo software experience
- 55W fast charging is still respectable
- Reverse wired charging for accessory power
- Slower charging compared to Realme X50 Pro 5G
- Limited battery endurance information
Realme X50 Pro 5G
- 65W SuperDart charging for incredibly fast top-ups
- 90-hour endurance rating suggests excellent battery life
- Aggressive pricing often makes it a better value
- Software experience may be less polished than vivo
- Potential for more aggressive thermal throttling
Display Comparison
Both phones utilize high refresh rate displays, though specific refresh rate data is missing. The Realme X50 Pro 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 635 nits, suggesting a brighter outdoor viewing experience than the iQOO 5 5G, for which brightness data is unavailable. The Realme’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) indicates a typical AMOLED panel, while the absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests standard refresh rate scaling, potentially impacting power consumption during dynamic content. Bezels are likely comparable given the similar design philosophies of both brands.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. Both are advertised as having Photo/Video capabilities. Without specific details on sensor size, aperture, or OIS, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The absence of information regarding the quality of secondary cameras (ultrawide, telephoto) suggests neither phone prioritizes exceptional versatility. Image processing styles likely differ, with vivo traditionally favoring more saturated and vibrant colors, while Realme often aims for a more natural look. The lack of detail makes a meaningful comparison impossible.
Performance
At the heart of both devices lies the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7nm+). The CPU configuration is identical – an octa-core setup with 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means raw processing power will be virtually indistinguishable between the two. However, thermal management could differ. While both utilize the same chipset, Realme’s larger user base and focus on gaming may have led to more aggressive thermal throttling profiles to maintain stability during extended gaming sessions. RAM configurations are not specified, but both likely offer LPDDR5 options for fast memory access.
Battery Life
The Realme X50 Pro 5G’s 65W SuperDart charging is a clear advantage, achieving a 100% charge in just 35 minutes, compared to the iQOO 5 5G’s 55W charging which takes 50 minutes. The Realme also boasts an ‘Endurance rating’ of 90 hours, indicating superior battery life. While actual battery capacity isn’t specified, the combination of faster charging and longer endurance makes the Realme the more convenient option for users who demand all-day battery life and minimal downtime. The iQOO 5 5G’s reverse wired charging is a useful addition, but doesn’t offset the charging speed deficit.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO 5 5G if you prioritize a potentially more refined software experience within the vivo ecosystem and are comfortable with slightly slower charging speeds. Buy the Realme X50 Pro 5G if you value rapid charging, excellent battery endurance, and a more aggressive price point, making it ideal for power users and those constantly on the go.