iQOO 5 5G vs. Oppo Find X2 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing speed and value, the iQOO 5 5G emerges as the winner. Its 55W charging, while slightly slower than the Find X2 Pro’s 65W, delivers a full charge in a respectable 50 minutes, and the overall package offers comparable performance at a potentially lower price point. The Find X2 Pro excels in display quality, but the iQOO 5 5G’s performance is more than adequate for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 5 5G | Oppo Find X2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 17. Released 2020, August 24 | 2020, March 06 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160 x 75.6 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 165.2 x 74.4 x 8.8 mm (Ceramic) / 9.5mm (Leather) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 217 g (Ceramic) / 200 g (Leather) (7.05 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, IQOO UI 1.5 | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 129mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 8K, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired, 100% in 50 min Reverse wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4260 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gray | Black, Orange, Gray, Green, Lamborghini Edition |
| Models | V2024A | CPH2025, PDEM30, OPG01 |
| Price | About 490 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 593717 (v8) GeekBench: 13245 (v4.4), 3269 (v5.1) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 5 5G
- Faster charging than many competitors (55W)
- Potentially better value for money
- Strong performance due to Snapdragon 865
- Display likely not as bright or vibrant as the Find X2 Pro
- Camera system likely less advanced
Oppo Find X2 Pro
- Exceptional display brightness and contrast
- Excellent battery life (88h endurance)
- Faster charging (65W) than iQOO 5 5G
- Likely more expensive than the iQOO 5 5G
- Performance is comparable to iQOO 5 5G, not superior
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X2 Pro boasts a superior display experience, achieving a measured peak brightness of 871 nits. While both phones utilize high-quality panels, the Find X2 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a deeper black level and more vibrant colors. The iQOO 5 5G’s display specifications are not provided, but given its focus on value, it likely utilizes a slightly less advanced panel. For users who consume a lot of media or work outdoors, the Find X2 Pro’s brighter display is a significant advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. The Oppo Find X2 Pro is known for its excellent camera system, likely featuring a larger main sensor and advanced image processing algorithms. The iQOO 5 5G, while capable, likely prioritizes value over cutting-edge camera technology. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is impossible, but the Find X2 Pro likely holds an edge in image quality, particularly in low-light conditions.
Performance
Both the iQOO 5 5G and the Oppo Find X2 Pro are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+), featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with the same core arrangement (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55). This means raw processing power will be nearly identical. However, thermal management could differentiate the two. The iQOO brand often focuses on sustained performance, potentially employing more aggressive cooling solutions. Without specific thermal testing data, it’s difficult to definitively say which phone will exhibit less throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X2 Pro has an endurance rating of 88 hours, indicating excellent battery life. The iQOO 5 5G’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 55W wired charging (100% in 50 min) is competitive. The Find X2 Pro, however, takes the lead with its 65W wired charging (100% in 38 min), offering a significantly faster recharge time. This faster charging is particularly beneficial for users who frequently run out of battery and need a quick top-up. The similar endurance ratings suggest comparable battery sizes, with the Find X2 Pro’s efficiency potentially being slightly higher.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO 5 5G if you need a phone that charges quickly, offers flagship-level performance for gaming and demanding tasks, and represents excellent value for money. Buy the Oppo Find X2 Pro if you prioritize a stunning display with exceptional brightness and contrast, and are willing to pay a premium for a more polished, all-around experience.