iQOO 3 5G vs Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and rapid charging, the vivo iQOO 3 5G emerges as the winner. Its 55W charging significantly outperforms the Mi 10 Pro’s 50W, and the slightly superior endurance rating provides a tangible benefit in daily use. However, the Mi 10 Pro’s wireless charging capabilities offer added convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 3 5G | Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 7, 28, 77, 78 Sub6 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (3.3 Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 41, 77, 78 - India | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, February 25. Released 2020, March 04 | 2020, February 13. Released 2020, February 18 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.5 x 74.9 x 9.2 mm (6.24 x 2.95 x 0.36 in) | 162.5 x 74.8 x 9 mm (6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 214.5 g (7.58 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, iQOO UI 1.0 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Triple-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, 5x hybrid zoom 20 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired, 50% in 15 min | 50W wired, PD3.0 30W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4400 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Volcano Orange, Tornado Black, Quantum Silver | Alpine White, Solstice Grey |
| Models | V1955A, I1927, I1928 | M2001J1G |
| Price | About 480 EUR | About 930 EUR |
| SAR | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.59 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 118h | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.3 LUFS (Good) | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 575601 (v8) GeekBench: 13325 (v4.4), 3402 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 595246 (v8) GeekBench: 3331 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo iQOO 3 5G
- Faster 55W wired charging
- Slightly better battery endurance (118h)
- Potentially more aggressive cooling for sustained performance
- Lacks wireless charging
- Limited camera details in provided data
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G
- Wireless charging (30W) and reverse wireless charging
- Slightly brighter display (858 nits)
- Potentially more advanced camera system (based on 'Pro' designation)
- Slower wired charging (50W)
- Lower battery endurance (101h)
Display Comparison
Both the iQOO 3 5G and Mi 10 Pro 5G feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED panels. However, the Mi 10 Pro edges out the iQOO 3 with a measured peak brightness of 858 nits versus 848 nits. While the difference is subtle, it translates to slightly better visibility under direct sunlight. Both displays likely utilize a 120Hz refresh rate, a common feature for flagship phones of this era, though this isn't explicitly stated in the provided data. The lack of information on PWM dimming frequencies prevents a definitive assessment of flicker-related eye strain, but both brands have historically employed high frequencies to mitigate this issue.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering minimal insight. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Mi 10 Pro’s positioning as a ‘Pro’ model suggests a more sophisticated camera system, potentially including larger sensors and more advanced features like periscope zoom. The iQOO 3 likely focuses on delivering a solid, all-around camera experience, while the Mi 10 Pro aims for enthusiast-level photography. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is a significant omission.
Performance
At the heart of both devices lies the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+). The CPU configuration is identical – an octa-core setup with 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means raw processing power will be nearly indistinguishable between the two. The real-world performance difference will likely hinge on thermal management and sustained clock speeds. While data on cooling solutions is absent, iQOO has a history of prioritizing gaming performance, suggesting potentially more aggressive cooling on the iQOO 3. Both devices utilize LPDDR5 RAM, ensuring fast memory access for demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The iQOO 3 5G boasts an endurance rating of 118 hours, surpassing the Mi 10 Pro’s 101 hours. This suggests a more efficient power management system or a slightly larger battery capacity, despite the lack of specific mAh figures. Crucially, the iQOO 3 supports 55W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes. The Mi 10 Pro offers 50W wired charging with PD3.0, 30W wireless charging, and 5W reverse wireless charging. The iQOO 3’s faster wired charging is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery, while the Mi 10 Pro’s wireless charging adds convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO 3 5G if you need the fastest possible wired charging and prioritize maximizing screen-on time for gaming and demanding applications. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G if you value wireless charging convenience and appreciate the flexibility of reverse wireless charging to top up accessories. Both are excellent choices for power users, but cater to slightly different priorities.