iQOO 15 vs Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Android Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and maximum processing power, the iQOO 15 is the clear winner. Its significantly longer active use score (21:47h vs 12:47h) and the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5’s Oryon cores provide a substantial advantage. However, the Find X7 Ultra’s faster charging and more mature platform appeal to those valuing convenience and software stability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo iQOO 15 | Oppo Find X7 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66, 71 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 20 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 20 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back or glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.8 x 8.1 mm (6.44 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) | 164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - China | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 215 g or 220 g (7.58 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~508 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.85 inches, 114.0 cm2 (~90.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 1000 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 6000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 16, up to 5 major Android upgrades, OriginOS 6 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.7, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.1, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (wide), 1/3.1", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PPS, PD 40W wireless Bypass charging | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Alpha, Legend, Gray, Green, Blue | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown |
| Models | I2501, V2505A | PHY110, PHY120 |
| Price | About 700 EUR | $ 546.64 |
vivo iQOO 15
- Exceptional battery life (21:47h active use)
- Cutting-edge Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor
- Significantly brighter display (2933 nits)
- Camera specifications unknown, potentially weaker than Oppo
- Software experience may be less refined than Oppo’s ColorOS
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
- Faster charging (100% in 26 minutes)
- More mature and refined software experience (ColorOS)
- Likely superior camera system based on brand reputation
- Significantly shorter battery life (12:47h active use)
- Less powerful processor compared to Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
- Lower peak display brightness (1165 nits)
Display Comparison
The iQOO 15 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 2933 nits compared to the Find X7 Ultra’s 1165 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the iQOO 15’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor use. Details regarding panel technology (LTPO, PWM dimming) are missing, but the brightness difference is a key differentiator. The Find X7 Ultra may compensate with potentially superior color accuracy, but this requires further testing.
Camera Comparison
Context data lacks detailed camera specifications for both devices. However, given Oppo’s history with flagship cameras, the Find X7 Ultra likely features a more sophisticated camera system with larger sensors and advanced image processing. The iQOO series typically focuses on performance over camera prowess. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison, but the Find X7 Ultra is likely to excel in image quality and versatility. We can assume both phones will have capable main sensors, but the Oppo likely has more advanced features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO 15’s Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) features Oryon V3 Phoenix cores – a custom design promising substantial performance gains over traditional Arm cores. Its octa-core configuration (2x4.6 GHz + 6x3.62 GHz) suggests a focus on sustained performance. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra utilizes the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm), a proven performer but built on a slightly older node. While the Gen 3’s Cortex-X4 prime core (3.3 GHz) is powerful, the iQOO 15’s Oryon cores likely deliver superior multi-core performance. The iQOO 15’s architecture suggests a potential edge in demanding applications and gaming.
Battery Life
The iQOO 15’s active use score of 21:47h is a significant advantage over the Find X7 Ultra’s 12:47h. This suggests a larger battery capacity or more efficient power management. While both support 100W wired charging, the iQOO 15 also offers 40W wireless charging, while the Find X7 Ultra offers 50W wireless. The Find X7 Ultra claims a 100% charge in 26 minutes, while the iQOO 15’s charging times are not specified. The iQOO 15’s longer runtime is a major selling point for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo iQOO 15 if you need uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and prioritize battery life above all else. You’ll benefit from the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5’s Oryon cores and the extended runtime. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you prefer a more polished software experience, value the convenience of extremely fast charging (100% in 26 minutes), and are willing to trade some battery life for a more refined overall package.